newbie from AZ, saving for a K110D

Brianna · 07-24-2007, 12:07 AM

I'm trying to learn as much as I can before I actully get my camera, which will be a while, I have to save up. If anyone wants to sell me theirs I'd be glad to hear it, lens and anything else relating too. And if anyone has advice for a new photographer I'd love to hear it!

Bostjan · 07-24-2007, 05:47 AM

Hello and welcome!

I think You have already realised, that this forum is a great place to share experiences and seek new knowledge. I'm sure You'll love it as Your new (yet to arrive I see) camera...

Enjoy!

Bostjan

SuperAkuma · 07-24-2007, 01:23 PM

Welcome to the board. I would save up a little bit more for the K100D instead of the K110D. The extra $50 or so you pay for the SR feature is well worth it.

matiki · 07-24-2007, 01:38 PM

Originally posted by SuperAkuma

Welcome to the board. I would save up a little bit more for the K100D instead of the K110D. The extra $50 or so you pay for the SR feature is well worth it.

I second this welcome and opinion. I just bought my first SLR, a K100D and I've shot over five hundred photos (in one week) getting to know it. I've done multiple A-B comparisons (with-without shake reduction) and there IS a difference, especially with longer exposure times when compensating for poor lighting. Just my $.02. I'm sure you'll be happy with either camera.

Brianna · 07-25-2007, 06:55 AM

oh really? I just might then, thanks for the opinions!

KFrog · 07-25-2007, 08:15 AM

Originally posted by SuperAkuma

Welcome to the board. I would save up a little bit more for the K100D instead of the K110D. The extra $50 or so you pay for the SR feature is well worth it.

Just check around the site and I think you'll find that is the consensus of opinion. SR is the way to go. As a matter of fact I don't think the K110D is in production anymore, at least not for the US market. Current SLRs are the K100D, K100D Super (September 2007 I think) and K10D.

07-24-2007, 12:07 AM	#1
Brianna Inactive Account Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2	newbie from AZ, saving for a K110D I'm trying to learn as much as I can before I actully get my camera, which will be a while, I have to save up. If anyone wants to sell me theirs I'd be glad to hear it, lens and anything else relating too. And if anyone has advice for a new photographer I'd love to hear it!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Newbie questions about saving RAW files	lectrolink	Digital Processing, Software, and Printing	7	08-03-2010 12:08 AM
Oh Goodie, the Democrats are saving us...	GingeM	General Talk	21	05-24-2010 09:59 PM
Saving rotation info	Pieter M	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	3	07-20-2009 06:23 AM
Saving images to mac	jonrob	Pentax DSLR Discussion	7	11-19-2008 02:38 AM
Saving Settings	Crescent City	Pentax DSLR Discussion	8	10-30-2007 05:15 AM

07-24-2007, 05:47 AM	#2
Bostjan Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Slovenia Posts: 140	Hello and welcome! I think You have already realised, that this forum is a great place to share experiences and seek new knowledge. I'm sure You'll love it as Your new (yet to arrive I see) camera... Enjoy! Bostjan

07-24-2007, 01:23 PM	#3
SuperAkuma Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA Photos: Gallery Posts: 445	Welcome to the board. I would save up a little bit more for the K100D instead of the K110D. The extra $50 or so you pay for the SR feature is well worth it.

07-24-2007, 01:38 PM	#4
matiki Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Seattle Photos: Albums Posts: 393	Originally posted by SuperAkuma Welcome to the board. I would save up a little bit more for the K100D instead of the K110D. The extra $50 or so you pay for the SR feature is well worth it. I second this welcome and opinion. I just bought my first SLR, a K100D and I've shot over five hundred photos (in one week) getting to know it. I've done multiple A-B comparisons (with-without shake reduction) and there IS a difference, especially with longer exposure times when compensating for poor lighting. Just my $.02. I'm sure you'll be happy with either camera.

07-25-2007, 06:55 AM	#5
Brianna Inactive Account Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2 Original Poster	oh really? I just might then, thanks for the opinions!

07-25-2007, 08:15 AM	#6
KFrog Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Katy, Texas Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 294	Originally posted by SuperAkuma Welcome to the board. I would save up a little bit more for the K100D instead of the K110D. The extra $50 or so you pay for the SR feature is well worth it. Just check around the site and I think you'll find that is the consensus of opinion. SR is the way to go. As a matter of fact I don't think the K110D is in production anymore, at least not for the US market. Current SLRs are the K100D, K100D Super (September 2007 I think) and K10D.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search