Originally posted by Damn Brit One final thought, most of the people I have seen complaining about 'those' threads, don't even get involved in them. The word 'Busybody' comes to mind.
I guess I'm a "Busybody then" as I complained about a recent thread where I thought some of the posts where absolutely moderation worthy. My only post in that thread was to call out the worst offender. I'll give props to him because he seemed to stop these types of post after.
Originally posted by Damn Brit To you Naysayers I say "The forum has thrived so far, do you really want to change it and risk becoming just like the other forums?".
IMO that argument carries zero weight. The forum won't change one ounce if we don't allow or closely moderate these types of discussions.
Originally posted by Damn Brit If you don't want to be offended by them, don't read them, it's not rocket science.
So why should I have to look at some people's political message in their signatures OUTSIDE of the General Talk?
It isn't political threads that offend me it is the deterioration of the behavior of individuals in those threads that offends me. So what you are saying is that I should somehow know ahead of time, before clicking on a thread, that things like "Or starts another circle jerk", "idiots in Mexifornia", "Look at the idiot and the murderer each from Mass" (and I could go on ) are in that thread and I shouldn't click on it to avoid being offended. I don't know, that is beyond "Rocket Science" for me
An attack on forums members political or religious beliefs is an attack on those forum members IMO and just shouldn't be allowed. It is one thing to debate and respectfully disagree but that isn't where a lot of these discussions go. If we want to HEAVILY moderate those threads fine but I really don't see the point in allowing them at all other then satisfying the few people who really like to participate in them.
Oh well, in the end it is up to Adam
John