Converting Raw-Files with Aperture, or better software?

stlind · 11-08-2010, 04:08 AM

Hello everyone.

I´ve been using Aperture to convert my Raw-files since i got my K-x (well, i export them as jpegs, is that even converting?)

But i see a lot of people using other converters? Are they significantly better than Aperture, or is it simply a preference of others?

Thanks,

**Fries** · 11-08-2010, 04:36 AM

Originally posted by stlind

Hello everyone.

I´ve been using Aperture to convert my Raw-files since i got my K-x (well, i export them as jpegs, is that even converting?)

But i see a lot of people using other converters? Are they significantly better than Aperture, or is it simply a preference of others?

Thanks,

I would say preference but I haven't tried any of the others. And what you are doing is converting! There is some free helpful stuff about Aperture over here: http://aperture.maccreate.com/.

**Miguel** · 11-08-2010, 06:30 PM

I think finding the right software tool for RAW processing is a balancing of technical strengths with functional capabilities. Do you want a tool that excels in technical rendering only? Or is asset management important? Do you like easy-to-learn interfaces that adhere to Macintosh guidelines?

Aperture may not reveal the details within shadowed areas to the extent that say Raw Developer (only for Mac) does, but its cataloging is much stronger and its user interface is more enjoyable to work with. That matters a lot when you look at all the time you spend using the thing. Also, the amount of improvement RAW Developer (or other software, this is just an example) imparts may be very minor.

How large are your prints?

I use Lightroom primarily these days, but I think Aperture and all the other tools are capable of performing equally well or better. The real work is bearing down and learning how to use the software expertly.

M

11-08-2010, 04:08 AM	#1
stlind Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 48	Converting Raw-Files with Aperture, or better software? Hello everyone. I´ve been using Aperture to convert my Raw-files since i got my K-x (well, i export them as jpegs, is that even converting?) But i see a lot of people using other converters? Are they significantly better than Aperture, or is it simply a preference of others? Thanks,

11-08-2010, 04:36 AM	#2
Fries Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Gauw Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,582	Originally posted by stlind Hello everyone. I´ve been using Aperture to convert my Raw-files since i got my K-x (well, i export them as jpegs, is that even converting?) But i see a lot of people using other converters? Are they significantly better than Aperture, or is it simply a preference of others? Thanks, I would say preference but I haven't tried any of the others. And what you are doing is converting! There is some free helpful stuff about Aperture over here: http://aperture.maccreate.com/. Last edited by Fries; 11-08-2010 at 04:42 AM. Reason: Added a link

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How to save stitched RAW files to a RAW file?	HermanLee	Digital Processing, Software, and Printing	7	07-09-2010 05:51 PM
RAW duplicate images - saving as RAW files	jpzk	Digital Processing, Software, and Printing	17	02-15-2010 07:01 PM
Batch RAW converting with the Pentax software	K-9	Digital Processing, Software, and Printing	8	10-13-2009 12:06 PM
Raw converting	Mojtala	Pentax DSLR Discussion	6	06-22-2008 11:01 AM
Does the Photoshop RAW converter work with Pentax RAW Files?	mconder	Pentax DSLR Discussion	3	05-15-2008 12:14 PM

11-08-2010, 06:30 PM	#3
Miguel Site Supporter Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Near Seattle Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,743	I think finding the right software tool for RAW processing is a balancing of technical strengths with functional capabilities. Do you want a tool that excels in technical rendering only? Or is asset management important? Do you like easy-to-learn interfaces that adhere to Macintosh guidelines? Aperture may not reveal the details within shadowed areas to the extent that say Raw Developer (only for Mac) does, but its cataloging is much stronger and its user interface is more enjoyable to work with. That matters a lot when you look at all the time you spend using the thing. Also, the amount of improvement RAW Developer (or other software, this is just an example) imparts may be very minor. How large are your prints? I use Lightroom primarily these days, but I think Aperture and all the other tools are capable of performing equally well or better. The real work is bearing down and learning how to use the software expertly. M