Originally posted by edgedemon The only thing i hated is no network drive support - that stopped me buying it.
Typically, I will import and browse on my laptop, but edit on my PC with 2 large screens. Not being able to store my photo's on a shared drive was a killer.
Originally posted by rgk Lack of network drive support would be an issue for me, too.
I am a bit confused here.
All my photos reside on a RAID5 file server mounted as shared drive. LR has no trouble whatsoever working with the files.
Better even, LR3 will realize if a shared drive is gone (e.g. when on the road) and dim the drive. But will still grant access to all photos via its preview cache stored in its local catalog (i.e., you can still browse photos).
You may refer to LR's inability to store the catalog (which is a database file) in the network. That's for technical reasons to prevent database corruption which is a good thing.
If you absolutely need the local catalog on two computers, just copy the database file (the .lrcat file) prior to opening LR. It is about 0.3GB for a 500GB of photos, so less than 0.1% the archive size. Just make sure your network paths are the same on both computers. So, don't map the same share to two different drive letters. Or better yet, don't map at all. But never mind, if the share moved, LR is able to track the change and adapt its catalog.
I use a different approach though: I have a favorite and a secondary computer and use another method: I import part of one catalog (found on the other computer exporting it) into my main catalog (via "import from catalog"). This way, I can start working on the secondary computer and then import the work onto the favorite computer. At the latter stage (in my case), the import will automatically transfer images from a local to network drive.
This "import from catalog" actually is a merge feature: If you copied the catalog file and proceeded differently from there on both computers, the import feature will only show you the "new" part from the other catalog in the import dialog.
I don't see many caveats with LR's approach. I was first puzzled too. But now, I appreciate the ability to view my photos when the network is unavailable.