Originally posted by davemdsn
It sounds like Will is actually talking about the web module, where you can make a Flash slideshow. There is no control over times or transitions as I recall. Worth a try, though.
Yes, my mistake, and thanks for catching it. They're different things indeed.
As Dave says, the slideshow creates a very simple document for viewing on your computer. It's actually a PDF; I'm not sure what's embedded inside it, but you open it up, the slideshow starts running and that's about all there is to it. You could send it in an email. The web gallery is a different thing and does (I think) use Flash. It creates html pages and references exported jpeg versions of your photos. You have a certain amount of control over the LOOK of both of these display formats.
Here are examples.
http://polytrope.com/wp/lightroom_slideshow.pdf William Porter Photography
As the first link is to a pdf file, you may have to download it and open it in your pdf viewer. The second link should be visible in your web browser.
I don't think either of these is nearly as useful as what you can get from a web photo service like SmugMug or even Flickr or Picasa Web Albums. The web gallery is basically a static gallery. No searching. It's not tied to a photo ordering application. I haven't seen a way to make the photos resize to the browser.
When I want a simple web gallery to give to someone on disk, I create it in Picasa. Here's an example of that:
20080101_picasa
I didn't take the time to clean that up and make it look nicer, but it's not hard to do. Anyway, compare to this:
link to Picasa Web Albums gallery
What's the bottom line here? Static, self-contained web galleries and slideshows are useful mainly for putting on CDs and distributing to clients or friends. But for anybody who has access to the Web (which these days is nearly everybody, nearly all the time), a database driven site is the best option of all.
Will