Originally posted by thechumpen Yeah that's fair enough. I posted it as quite a few (myself included) went off on the tangent of build your own in that thread.
The only thing I would add to what I mentioned in the above thread is - Is there a specific reason you want mini-ITX? I ask as if you go with something larger you will generally get better spec for lower cost. Also, a larger board and case means you can have things like larger cooling fans and CPU cooler towers which will make them more quiet. Also larger board will give you the option of adding more storage later (for additional speed using RAID or for additional storage).
Personally if I was building something I would go with the spec I mentioned in my post in above thread. For storage I would concentrate on fast and total space rather than worry about redundancy and then use something like Crashplan for offsite backup (which is what I use now). Of course you need to be happy with cloud storage for that. Could use external USB instead.
If you want mini-ITX and small case then you will probably be limited to small number of drives so point above is especially valid.
Hmm.... Well, i do understand the trade-off. As all things in life especially so in this current era, there has to be a premium somewhere for going compact. I'm looking to make it as small and yet as practical as possible in terms of financial and space constraint. I'm a pretty anal guy in keeping my room neat and tidy, and so is my current laptop. Haha! (in fact, my policy for keeping my room neat is: if it's taking space and NOT being used for 3 months at least, out to the garbage it goes! And this applies to everything in the house that belongs to me, no matter the cost.. Haha! ;P)
Gave it some thought and concluded that a mini-ITX casing which houses 2-3 drive bays would suffice; 1 SSD(OS) and 1 or 2 HDD(data and everthing else). I've an external NAS with 4TB but it's pretty slow if i were to make LR "pull" my photos from it as WiFi is still very slow for such task. Hence, the need for an internal HDD in the rig.
Hmm... I took a look at CrashPlan but i figure transfer speed would be just as slow since it'll still be via WiFi. Maybe just like my NAS, using it as a backup for my photos is ok but using it as the source of photo data reference for LR would be pretty slow too..
Originally posted by pxpaulx As long as it is a usb 3.0 drive and your case or board as a usb 3.0 port this is the way to go. I bought a USB 3.0 1tb drive and a 3.0 card reader and things transfer 2-3x or even faster than my older PCs. I would get a 120gb (or maybe 240 if you watch for a deal) as the only internal drive and then use an external drive (or 2 for backup).
No question on getting the i5 processor either. I built my own but did a standard mid tower so can't really help in the mini itx respect (this was also my first build). I use it for gaming primarily, but a good video card will likely be helpful with processing (someone correct me if I'm wrong!).
Yep, seems that most mobo nowadays come with USB 3.0 ports, not much of a choice eh? It's a good "forced" choice though.. Haha!
Say, i've zoomed in an i5 processor, question is, which one? There seems to be various model numbers listed on the Intel website that i'm not sure which is better for me. Quad core with no need of overclocking, which one should i take?
SSD for sure at least 120Gb, but which brand and model? Understand that it's best to look up at individual's specs but there are so many brands out there, any help in shortlisting at 2-3 brands in particular for comparison?
Originally posted by thechumpen Depends on the software (so check) but most photo editing stuff such as Lightroom will be fine with onboard video cards. Most software tends to be disk, CPU or RAM based rather than utilising video card power (unless we're talking gaming or 3D graphics etc). Just make sure it can handle the resolution you want on your monitor, or indeed whether it has dual monitor support if you require it.
I believe this is so true! Coz my current laptop running on an i7 with onboard graphic HD4000(or is it HD3000?) seems to move along fine with no lag at all. Back to space constraint, i don't think i'll be running dual monitor and will instead stick to single monitor. Zoomed down to Dell Ultrasharp series, either 24" or 27", not the 30" due to budget and performance gain ratio.
Would this then require me to have a video card?
Originally posted by thechumpen Nice! Never knew there's such a link!
Originally posted by reeftool Thanks for this! One of those that i kinda shortlisted... Will have to review and consider further. Airflow and proper cooling? This i'll ask my game nerd of a friend for help.. ;P
Originally posted by Miguel Lifehacker has a nice listing of five excellent small form factor PC cases.
Re: the innards, I think you are on the right track. I like keeping things as quiet as possible, which you are doing by not having a dedicated graphics card. 16GB of RAM is very correct.
It is quite easy to build a computer these days. I built a high-end Hackintosh last summer and it was the only computer I've ever assembled. The hardware was fun; the software a bit challenging but quite do-able.
M
Thank you for the tip regarding Lifehacker! Never came across that.. Google surely is getting bigger and bigger by the nanoseconds.. Such a headache! Haha!
So yea, all in all, thanks for the help so far guys! Hope more can be chimed in to making of my "perfect" small and cost-effective mini-ITX photo editing mean machine!