Originally posted by Outis There was still a way to buy a non-subscription version of Photoshop Elements 15, so I bought that. It turns out that it doesn't have the tools I would need. There wasn't any indication at the time that what I was buying wasn't the full version or that there were tools I wouldn't be getting.
I am no fan of Adobe's business model(s)
and you have your right to rant, but I thought a few comments and points of affirmation might be in order:
- The Adobe CC business model is poor value for many users, even at the lowest price point. The $9.99/month Photography Plan makes sense for heavy Photoshop users, but is money wasted for those who seldom use a full-on editor.
- Elements 15 is still available to purchase as DVD for $59 USD at B&H or download from Adobe. That is the full version. (There is no continuously updated CC version.)
- Elements 15 (full version) is available for free download for evaluation. My decision against purchase was based on the evaluation download.
- Elements 15 is not Photoshop nor even Photoshop "lite" despite a certain degree of interoperability and partial plug-in support. It is a completely separate product and is somewhat limited in several areas, particularly if attempting a color-managed work flow. Adobe does their customers a HUGE disservice by prefixing several their product names with the word "Photoshop".
- Adobe's product documentation truly sucks. This is true across its full product line at all levels (marketing, user guides, and post-sales support). As a result, it is difficult to do a comparison between product features.* It is little wonder you found yourself without the tools you expected.
- Adobe's Web site is truly opaque unless you are interested in their CC line.
- It is not obvious, but it almost never makes sense to pay list price for any Adobe product
Originally posted by Outis If I wanted to spend a ton of time trying to figure this out on my own, I could have used GIMP for free.
Yes, you might have used GIMP for free. I am a long-time fan going back to GIMP's beginnings. The main reason I am not a current user is that I don't have an operational Linux install and find that PaintShop Pro better meets my needs on Windows due to its close emulation of Photoshop's layering features. One nice thing is that GIMP now supports 16/32 bit color. It is a very viable option and documentation is on a par with Adobe's.
Steve
* This is true even within-product. I have been a Lightroom user since v1.0 (currently using 5.x) and am still surprised to find undocumented and/or poorly documented features. Buying one of the excellent companion books is a great help, but should not be necessary.