Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 15 Likes Search this Thread
10-18-2017, 08:44 AM - 1 Like   #16
Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
pschlute's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Surrey, UK
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,198
QuoteOriginally posted by 89Y49Si Quote
If you notice though, the Lightroom histogram is quite a bit more bunched up? in the shadow area whereas the histogram on the K50 is more spread out in the shadow areas
Luminance versus RGB histogram, and the fact that a different set of development parameters (Lightroom default versus your camera settings) being applied to the raw image will both affect the shape and spread of the histogram.

10-18-2017, 02:40 PM - 1 Like   #17
Forum Member




Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taylor, MI
Posts: 98
Original Poster
Well, I did some testing and found out that using either the "Natural" or "Bright" custom image yields the closest between the back LCD and Lightroom. So it looks like I'll stick to using either one of those. Highlight correction did absolutely nothing to the highlights in the RAW files on Lightroom. No exposure compensation was used during testing either.

I want to say thanks to everyone who helped out. I really appreciate it!!

Testing as follows:
Setup up tripod, set exposure, take picture with different custom images and with/without highlight correction.
At the end, I did a factory reset, set the WB to match the rest of the pictures, then took another pic.

Lens used was the K24 f/2.8

All pictures were taken at ISO200, f/5.6, and 1/800th. Calculated using Sunny 16 and then "overexposed" by 1 stop for some shadow detail. WB was custom set to 5500K.

Modified Muted profile:




Muted w/ Highlight Correction





Natural profile:




Natural w/ Highlight Correction:





Factory reset + 5500K WB to make it even.


10-18-2017, 02:51 PM   #18
Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
pschlute's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Surrey, UK
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,198
All looks good, glad you got it sorted. Maybe your computer monitor is a bit too bright !....no only joking (although most folks' monitors are too bright)

Nice to see I am not the only one that remembers sunny 16

Take care
10-18-2017, 03:03 PM   #19
Forum Member




Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taylor, MI
Posts: 98
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by pschlute Quote
All looks good, glad you got it sorted. Maybe your computer monitor is a bit too bright !....no only joking (although most folks' monitors are too bright)

Nice to see I am not the only one that remembers sunny 16

Take care
Thanks!

And one of my most used film cameras has no built in meter, so I am always using the Sunny 16 rule. I practically live by it haha.

10-18-2017, 03:25 PM - 1 Like   #20
Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
pschlute's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Surrey, UK
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,198
QuoteOriginally posted by 89Y49Si Quote
Thanks!

And one of my most used film cameras has no built in meter, so I am always using the Sunny 16 rule. I practically live by it haha.
and you know so many folks would learn about their photography a hell of a lot quicker if they followed the same routine from the get-go. But persuading someone who has just shelled out hundreds or thousands on their first camera, to use it in manual mode and dont look at the meter.....well forget it !
10-18-2017, 03:38 PM   #21
Forum Member




Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taylor, MI
Posts: 98
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by pschlute Quote
and you know so many folks would learn about their photography a hell of a lot quicker if they followed the same routine from the get-go. But persuading someone who has just shelled out hundreds or thousands on their first camera, to use it in manual mode and dont look at the meter.....well forget it !
I have too many friends who can't take a picture to save their life, unless they use the meter and chimp after taking every shot. They are adamant that the meter is king and you can't outsmart it. But out of the maybe 15 rolls I've put through that camera, I think maybe only a couple of pics had the exposure way out of wack that they couldn't be saved. I rarely use the meter, even in my digital cameras.
10-18-2017, 09:15 PM   #22
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by 89Y49Si Quote
Thanks!

And one of my most used film cameras has no built in meter, so I am always using the Sunny 16 rule. I practically live by it haha.
QuoteOriginally posted by pschlute Quote
and you know so many folks would learn about their photography a hell of a lot quicker if they followed the same routine from the get-go. But persuading someone who has just shelled out hundreds or thousands on their first camera, to use it in manual mode and dont look at the meter.....well forget it !
The lesson of Sunny 16 is that "accurate exposure" means nothing in the real world.


Steve

10-19-2017, 12:23 PM   #23
Digitiser of Film
Loyal Site Supporter
BigMackCam's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North East of England
Posts: 20,670
QuoteOriginally posted by stevebrot Quote
The lesson of Sunny 16 is that "accurate exposure" means nothing in the real world.
I was several years into my photography before I realised that in-camera metering averages out the selected area to mid-grey For a long time I really thought I was doing something very wrong - and in a sense I was by not understanding how the metering worked. Once I learned that, my exposure in-camera improved ten-fold.

I've never used Sunny 16, and I really should try limiting myself to that for a time, just to build that skill - although I believe here in the North East of England, it's more like the Sunny 8 rule in Summer
10-19-2017, 01:01 PM   #24
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by BigMackCam Quote
I believe here in the North East of England, it's more like the Sunny 8 rule in Summer
...same here at latitude N 45° 42'...


Steve
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
adobe, aperture, brightness, camera, correction, data, exposure, flickr, histogram, image, joey, jpg, k50, lcd, lens, lightroom, photo, photography, photoshop, picture, profile, response, saturated, screen, sensor

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Argus Argoflex woes... timw4mail Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 5 10-05-2017 09:03 AM
Film woes (mistakes and lessons learned) Femto1969 Film Processing, Scanning, and Darkroom 19 07-21-2017 11:47 AM
Nature camera woes but it still goes to the Rookery dewolf Post Your Photos! 6 02-20-2017 10:24 AM
645 Z eye piece woes. Help needed Gareth Iwan Jones Pentax Medium Format 6 11-13-2015 04:33 AM
Lightroom printing woes pingflood Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 2 01-04-2009 11:25 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:59 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top