Originally posted by DSLRnovice Is it better to use 2 programs, one for correcting color, exposure, lens distortion etc with the RAW file, and another for editing - dodging, burning etc - the converted file?
Or is there a moderately priced (under $200.US) that can do both?
I don't think it's necessarily better to use one "do it all" application or two (or more
). It depends on how you think about the process, what you want to do and what works for you.
I used to use Lightroom 6 (stand-alone / perpetual), occasionally with Photoshop Essentials (version 14, I think), and various plug-ins for both. I was very happy indeed with that setup, and had built up quite a lot of experience in using it. But Adobe's move to a monthly subscription model really jarred with me, so I moved to open-source (and, hence, free) software.
I now use Darktable 2.4.4 for RAW image development, GIMP 2.8 for Photoshop-style editing (including layers), and digiKam 5 for library management. I also use a GIMP plug-in called G'MIC-Qt, primarily for film emulations. It might sound like a complicated setup, but it works very, very well. There's a learning curve to each tool, but the online documentation is excellent (you just need to invest a little time to read it and try things out for yourself), and the capabilities are - at the very least - comparable to the better commercial products.
My setup is running on Linux Mint 18.3, but I know Darktable and GIMP both have very capable Windows versions available, and they're well-maintained too. I'm not sure about digiKam, but it's worth looking into.