Originally posted by PDL Graphics tablets are not a slow workaround - Just ask David (you know who I mean)
I never stated tablets are a slow workaround. I said flipping the pen around to be able to erase and go back to your previous brush type without having
explicitly to select the brush type (via "B", "Q", "S", or one of the respective icons) again, is a slow workaround.
Regarding this particular question -- flipping the pen vs using keyboard shortcuts -- see David Grover's view on that in
my previous post.
Originally posted by PDL This comment makes no sense. You do not release the mouse to type?
Of course I have to release the mouse for typing.
Originally posted by PDL You still need to grab the mouse.
The huge difference is that the mouse will still be there where I left it and I can simply place my hand on it and continue.
In contrast, the tablet pen will be lying on the tablet and I have to pick it up again, reestablishing my grip, before I can continue.
The alternative is to keep the pen in one's hand while typing which is unacceptable to any touch typist.
I guess having a pen holder might improve matters slightly but having to locate it for placing and grabbing the pen is inefficient, compared to simply moving one's hand to the mouse again.
Originally posted by PDL The action is similar you are being a bit obtuse here.
The action is not similar at all. If you don't see the difference or don't mind the difference, you are welcome to your opinion, but there is an objective difference.
Originally posted by PDL Again, this statement makes no sense. Are you not aware that brush feather and flow are as adjustable one pens as it is on mice?
Of course I'm aware of that.
Even basic tablets even support translating pen pressure into flow or feathering.
However, this never worked well enough for me to adopt using a pen and I doubt upgrading to a more expensive tablet would change matters.
I find it much easier to simply using multiple strokes with a mouse and a constant (slow) flow.
Originally posted by PDL Where does this illusion about "one stroke" come from?
I offered that as a possible advantage for using pens. In theory, their pressure sensitivity could be argued to obviate the need to ever set the flow rate explicitly. By using exactly the right amount of pressure one could theoretically apply the right flow in one stroke, as opposed to having to build up the flow with multiple slow flow strokes. As I said, in practice this does not work for me but I offered that it may for others.
Again, all of this has very little to do with my criticism of C1's user interaction design. Again, by granting one more keyboard shortcut -- mapping to a function that selects the correct brush type depending on the currently active layer -- no one would have to give up anything about the new system but a number of people could start working as efficiently as they used to be able to. Also, they'd be able to free up two to three buttons on their consoles for more important functions. With the new system, these buttons are wasted on explicit brush selection functions.