Originally posted by BigMackCam Software can be a bit like cameras and lenses. I have a friend who always buys the latest complete version of Microsoft Office, but so far as I can tell he doesn't need or benefit especially from most of the new features. In fact, his use-cases are mostly the same as mine with LibreOffice - writing letters and simple documentation, and building the occasional spreadsheet with, at most, a couple of graphs. Having said that, he clearly enjoys getting his new software and playing around with the new features for a while...
About 10 years ago I helped my Dad upgrade his computer, and he was 99% convinced that he needed to go buy a full copy of Microsoft Office for $300, $400, something like that. I told him that for the few letters and spreadsheets that he uses it for he could certainly use LibreOffice. He countered that at work, before he retired, they all went to MS Office because everything else messed up all the formatting and wouldn't read the files and it was a disaster. After a while I just told him that he can go spend $400 if he wants, but at least he should try LibreOffice.
10 years later he's still using LibreOffice.
---------- Post added 01-28-22 at 07:56 AM ----------
Originally posted by Dartmoor Dave I have to confess that I gave up on Gnome3 after a few days and went back to the Gnome2 style MATE. Somehow I just couldn't get my head around the Gnome3 inerface. But then, I'm still using Xfce on one of my Linux machines so maybe I'm just not suited to any sort of up-to-date software at all.
Oops, I'm drifting off topic again so back to Windows 11. Nope. Not going there. Never installing that one.
I use the Spartan and bare-bones Xubuntu and Xfce on my 12-core machine with 32Gb of memory and gaming-optimized SSD because I can't abide inefficiency. Why would I use 50 clock cycles of my 10 billion on user interface tasks when instead I could use 20?