Originally posted by konraDarnok
No, I'd like to do the opposite of a star trail. Take a long exposure the counteracts the earth's rotation -- or a series of photos. To get a higher dynamic range in the final shot without an extremely fast wide angle lens or a table to rotate the camera.
Like this:
APOD: 2008 July 29 - The Milky Way Over Ontario I think i know what you want to do, but as we are constantly moving relative to the stars, i don't think it is possible to take multiple exposures that match up perfectly unless your tripod or telescope has some sort of tracking device...or do you mean many short exposures that are stacked in photoshop or similar? I have done a few star shots and the longest time i have got before a star seems to deviate from a perfect dot of light is about 20 seconds....so i suppose with a camera at high iso, with good noise reduction that does not obliterate detail (mmm) with a fast lens wide open (dodgy, could result in soft image) might be able to take 80 or so .25 sec images and then stack em up in software....i'd go for a tracker, i'm saving for one right now!
good luck tho
davebris33