For Sale - Sold: Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II APO EX DG Macro HSM

Sandy Hancock · 01-19-2015, 02:49 AM

PentaxForums.com Marketplace Listing

Item for Sale
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II APO EX DG Macro HSM

Asking Price
530.00 AUD

Item Location
Adelaide (Australia)

Item Description
This is the earlier, non-optically-stabilised version. I bought it new in October 2010.

It is well used but still in excellent condition. Everything works perfectly. There is a tiny mark on the front element, visible in the photo; it does not affect image quality at all.

Supplied with original hood, front and rear lens cap, soft case with neckstrap, box and paperwork from original sale.

I last used this lens in August, every day for the month, as part of the "Single In" challenge. All those images can be reviewed HERE

Are you the original owner of the item being sold?
Yes

Are you selling or trading this item?
Selling

Item Condition (Key)
Used
Excellent

Shipping Destinations
Worldwide

Shipping Charge
Included in Australia. Add $20 for international shipping

Shipping Services
Australia Post

Accepted Payment Types
PayPal accepted. EFT preferred within Australia.

Return Policy & Additional Details
Return within 7 days of arrival for full refund. Postage at buyer's expense.

Please send me a private message if interested in the item!

Attached Images

View Picture EXIF

View Picture EXIF

IsaacT · 01-19-2015, 10:52 AM

I am interested. Can you post a full size picture so that I can inspect it. I am in the market for a 70-200 f/2.8 but I am worried about the mark on the lens.

Tom S. · 01-19-2015, 11:14 AM

Originally posted by IsaacT

I am interested. Can you post a full size picture so that I can inspect it. I am in the market for a 70-200 f/2.8 but I am worried about the mark on the lens.

I'm not sure what you mean by full size, as the pictures posted, at least on my monitor are already about twice the actual size of the lens.

IsaacT · 01-19-2015, 01:24 PM

I mean a picture taken with the lens to prove image quality is unaffected.

Sandy Hancock · 01-19-2015, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by IsaacT

I mean a picture taken with the lens to prove image quality is unaffected.

Hi Isaac. The link to my Single In album has nearly 70 images which are all 2048 pixels on the long side. Surely that is enough to go on with.

Tom S. · 01-19-2015, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by IsaacT

I mean a picture taken with the lens to prove image quality is unaffected.

Oh, OK.

Sandy Hancock · 01-20-2015, 02:23 AM

Sold pending clearance of funds.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG APO Macro HSM II	tkj365	Sold Items	2	06-22-2014 11:59 AM
For Sale - Sold: Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG APO Macro HSM II	SointulArt	Sold Items	4	04-24-2014 08:06 AM

01-19-2015, 10:52 AM	#2
IsaacT Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 123 Feedback Score: 0 (0%)	I am interested. Can you post a full size picture so that I can inspect it. I am in the market for a 70-200 f/2.8 but I am worried about the mark on the lens.

01-19-2015, 11:14 AM	#3
Tom S. Veteran Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: S.E. Michigan Posts: 4,317 Feedback Score: 12 (100%)	Originally posted by IsaacT I am interested. Can you post a full size picture so that I can inspect it. I am in the market for a 70-200 f/2.8 but I am worried about the mark on the lens. I'm not sure what you mean by full size, as the pictures posted, at least on my monitor are already about twice the actual size of the lens.

01-19-2015, 01:24 PM	#4
IsaacT Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 123 Feedback Score: 0 (0%)	I mean a picture taken with the lens to prove image quality is unaffected.

01-19-2015, 02:00 PM	#5
Sandy Hancock Moderator Site Supporter Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia Posts: 11,275 Feedback Score: 54 (100%) Original Poster	Originally posted by IsaacT I mean a picture taken with the lens to prove image quality is unaffected. Hi Isaac. The link to my Single In album has nearly 70 images which are all 2048 pixels on the long side. Surely that is enough to go on with.

01-19-2015, 02:32 PM	#6
Tom S. Veteran Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: S.E. Michigan Posts: 4,317 Feedback Score: 12 (100%)	Originally posted by IsaacT I mean a picture taken with the lens to prove image quality is unaffected. Oh, OK.

01-20-2015, 02:23 AM	#7
Sandy Hancock Moderator Site Supporter Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia Posts: 11,275 Feedback Score: 54 (100%) Original Poster	Sold pending clearance of funds.