How does photography compare to your other hobbies as far as enjoyment, time commitment, money, and accessibility (how frequently you get to do it) ?
In the past, when my dear lovely wife balks at the magnitude of a purchase I'm making, there is a small voice in my head (which sometimes makes it out my mouth) that says "Be glad I'm not involved in (insert more expensive hobby here)"
Photography, for most people (for me anyways), seems to be a fairly inexpensive hobby. I feel sorry for people who have very expensive hobbies, or hobbies that are not as easily accessible. If I want to take pictures and practice my hobby, I get home, turn the camera on, and have fun, as my main interest right now is family photos. It effectively costs me nothing to do so. I can take as many pictures as I want, and I could potentially trash them all if I wanted to. My current setup (K200D, Metz 48 flash, FA 50/1.4, FA 35/2) cost me about $1500 so far. And the end result is a lasting one, a collection of beautiful pictures that I can treasure for the rest of my life.
Then there are other hobbies. I live in the vicinity of a lake and one of my friends likes boating. A boat is much more expensive than a camera system, has much greater upkeep costs (gas, etc.), and you cannot just decide to spend a few minutes on the boat when you get home from work. It's a significant investment of time, money, and energy to go out on the boat.
I suppose similar things can be said about cars, guns, skydiving, or what-have-you. Each of those hobbies is either much more expensive or much less accessible than photography. Or both.
And yes - I know photography can become very expensive. But I'd venture to say that for amateur hobbyists like me, it is a fairly inexpensive hobby. Perhaps because for now, I am content with my two lens, one body set up. I'm sure the money investment would rival some of the more expensive hobbies if I had 400+ lenses and 7 bodies.
My other hobby also fits the inexpensive yet accessible categories - board games. I'm talking Euro style board games, not Monopoly and Candyland. For anyone who knows what I'm talking about, I own Carcassonne, Dominion, Race for the Galaxy, Stone Age, In the Year of the Dragon, Tobago, and Fury of Dracula. (I'm sure some of you have heard of Settlers of Catan, have friends who play it, or even have played it yourself!) Again, this is also a hobby that can get very expensive, as some people have game collections of 300+. Board gaming is much more of an accessible hobby to me than many others because my wife likes games too...she beats me most of the time
(To fit the accessibility requirement, I do not buy games that require more than 2 people)
What are your thoughts on the matter?