Originally posted by NYpHoToGraphEr I am interested in knowing if Landscape and selling stock photos can make you a comfortable living?
I know that portrait, commerical, food, news photography can provide a steady job and living but can you make a living taking pictures of flowers and trees and streets?
Okay, I'm going to weigh in a bit here. Because there is far more supply (people who can take good images) than demand (clients looking for images), every area of photography is extremely competitive. You can reduce competition by focusing on subjects few others are doing, but you will never completely eliminate it.
At the same time, professional photography is often very expensive. Even a moderately equipped portrait studio can run into thousands of dollars (rent, utilities, furnishings, phone, photo equipment, etc), and that doesn't include ongoing advertising and promotion costs for the business itself. You can reduce this burden by using your home as a studio early in your career. But, since most residential property is zoned non-commercial in the USA, you'll eventually have to move to expensive commercial property (leased or owned) to gain enough customers to make any real money.
Some attempt to get around zoning by moving to remote areas, but customers are seldom willing to travel far. Nonetheless, some have been successful using this tactic, either by increasing advertising to prompt customers to travel further or being lucky enough to find an un-zoned area not that far from the potential customer base. By the way, a larger, well equipped, studio for commercial photography will increase those costs many times over, while photography solely on location (weddings, etc) can cut studio costs (making this an attractive, but very competitive, option).
Anyway, lets get to your original question about landscape photography and stock photo agencies. Sadly, the market for this type of photography is very low simply because there are few clients looking for these types of images. Calendar and greeting card companies are the two largest buyers, and neither use that many images. For example, while a typical magazine might use anywhere between 600-1500 images per year, a typical calendar usually only involves 12-14 images. At the same time, both of these industries (calendars and greeting cards) are flooded at the moment, driving profits down (which also drives down what these companies are willing to pay for images).
So can one really "make a living" from photography? Of course. There are many photographers, including myself, doing exactly that. However, far more fail than succeed, with actual photography skill seldom the determining factor. Instead, success often depends more on how well one understands business, finance, marketing, promotion, the clients, the client's business (for commercial work), and so on. Financial resources play a role, as does professional appearance, behavior, and manners. And, of course, all of this is in addition to being a reliable, competent, photographer.
stewart