Originally posted by jeremy_c It seems a lot of people are using manual mode. The only time I am in manual mode is taking a night shot. Is there any reason for using manual mode over Av? One person did state that you can set the exposure for a given scene then shot several shots under similar conditions and have them all come out correctly, but this is chancing it a bit?
Maybe, but if you keep an eye on the meter - and an eye on the prevailing light - it isn't particular difficult to notice when a given shot might need to be bumped up or down.
Conversely, shooting in Av is also chancing it, quite a lot. Consider that if you take a picture of someone wearing a white shirt then another of someone wearing a black shirt, you're likely to get two wildly differently exposures. Meters tend to overreact to that sort of stuff. So really, either way, you've got to be on the ball and anticipate when you'll need to deviate from the settings you've made. I find that in practice, it's about the same either way, but the thought process required to alter settings is more natural to me in M mode.
Another very important factor - really, the one that clinched the deal for me - I use manual exposure lenses a lot, where "M" mode is all you get. And no multi-segment metering, either. So I spend a lot of time in M mode with center weighted metering, because there is basically no choice. Once you've become accustomed to working that way, it's always momentarily (actually, more than momentarily) disconcerting to have to get used to a different way of working every time you change lenses. I find it's less confusing to just leave the camera in M mode with center-weighted metering, so my camera always works more or less the same way.