Originally posted by richardstringer When using depth of field calculators, what distance do I set the 'distance to subject' to?
You should just input a couple different ones and use the one that gives you the most DoF. But your question is a hard one. Here is why:
a) Most modern lenses no longer have DoF scales, not even distance scales. This means that even if you know that you should focus at "2.4m" - you still don't know where on the focus ring that is.
b) Modern DSLRs no longer have a big viewfinder. Tiny viewfinders won't let you see critical focus, even if you use DoF preview and everything.
c) Some lenses have distance scales, but the distance scales are wrong. (I am looking at you, Samyang 14mm f2.8)
d) Some lenses allow focusing past infinity. So if you use manual focus to just spin the focus ring all the way, you can actually manage to have
nothing in focus.
e) The environment affects your lens. If its hot, the focusing might behave differently than if its cold, because materials contract and expand.
f) Hyperfocal focusing and zone focusing are not perfectly reliable on modern DSLRs. You see, hyperfocal is supposed to give you "acceptable" sharpness from near to infinity, but I don't always find the results to be "acceptable." So you need to do some tests
g) If you are using a zoom lens, remember that zooming can affect your focus. Some lenses are parfocal (which means the focus stays on the same distance, even if you move the zoom ring), some arent. There is a list (a thread on this forum), but just remember that with some zoom lenses, you can zoom in and focus, then zoom out and it will be perfect. With other lenses, if you zoom, you need to re-focus.
Here are other things to keep in mind
1 The wider the angle, the more DoF you get. I'm sure there are complicated physics behind this. The problem is, if the angle is very wide, you won't see much detail in very far away things anyway, because they will seem tiny tiny
2 The narrower the aperture, the more DoF you get. But be careful, because at some point diffraction sets in, and you lose sharpness/IQ. So you usually don't want to go above f14 (some say even f8 is the limit). But you should test this for yourself to get a better feel. Its not always the same aperture that limits your gear. And sometimes you just have to go above f16, even up to f22. Just be ready for it.
3 You need to sharpen your photo in post processing. Sometimes a lot. This is not because the gear is bad, but because everyone else is doing it, so if you dont do it, your photos look blurry in comparison.
4 Some lenses are better for landscape photos than other lenses. Sharpness at infinity, angle of view, CA and flaring.. there are many characteristics that affect the final photo. You can try getting a lens that is more specialized for landscapes. (the kit lens is not bad, but its a general lens, it doesn't excel at anything)
So you can try using manual focus and set focus just underneath infinity. Or focus on an object that you want to have in focus in the final photo. For example, a photo can have huge DoF, but if a person in it is Out of focus, it probably won't be a great photo. So focus on the person. Or sign, or animal, or natural object. Often, this is more important than whether or not the DoF extends to infinity.
Also, for landscapes, you should use a tripod, 2 sec timer, lens hood, and low ISO. These things will improve the photo a lot. Tripod keeps the camera stable. 2 sec timer disables SR (because you are on tripod anyway) and uses mirror lockup, so there are less vibrations due to mirror action. Low ISO means less noise and more detail. Lens hood is generally a good idea, as it can improve contrast, prevent flaring, etc. And don't be afraid of using DoF preview or the digital zoom focus assist, even focus peaking.
Edit: I hope some of the really good landscape photographers from this forum chime in, I would love to know any more tips and tricks to this