Originally posted by Flugelbinder So, what's the point on using AF-C? Why not just AF-S?
Well, with Wired's suggested technique, you set the camera body to AFC, and you can then either take one shot or several (depending on how long you keep your finger pressing the shutter button), whether tracking or setting a fixed focus.
If you are tracking a moving target, you would keep the AF button pressed down before and during the time period (for several shots) that you are activating the shutter, or before and at the moment you were to take a single shot.
If you are shooting a stationary target, and the target is where the body's focus point is located, you would hold the AF button down and shoot (once), or (I suppose, if you were careful not to change the camera-to-target distance) you could press the AF button down briefly, let up on it, and then shoot afterward.
If you are shooting a stationary target, and the target is to end up elsewhere in the frame (i.e., not under the focus point), you would first set the focus (by briefly pressing the AF button while placing the target behind the focus point), then re-frame the image, and shoot (once).
Of course, for the latter situation, you could have changed over from AFC to AFS beforehand, if you wished -- maybe that's what you'd prefer to do.
But, you said, "in AFC, if one uses the focus-recompose technique, the camera will not stay with the previous focus point (say the eyes) like other brands; it will instead, follow the focus point and try to focus again where the focus point will stop (most likely the background)". Well, my experience is that that will NOT happen -- once you let up on the AF button, even if you are still pressing the shutter button (which no longer activates the AF function, right?), you could keep pressing the shutter button until the buffer fills up (or "till the cows come home"), and the focus plane still will not have changed after the AF button was let up (although I am not sure why you would want to do that anyway).