Originally posted by ivanvernon 
There may be some subpopulations who frown upon being photographed, at least by total strangers. I am not fully informed on this matter, but these subpopulations possibly may include the Amish here in the U.S. and Moslems in some parts of the world. Before offending an objecting subpopulation, one might find it advisable to check in with local photographers or knowledgable people regarding what is considered acceptable or unacceptable even if you personally have no qualms about violating the beliefs/preferences of others. I would be interested in observations from others who are more well informed.
I agree, Ivan, and a very good point, too. If I knew or had reason to suspect, that the (intended) subject would be upset, I'd go elsewhere.
Too many other, easier, friendlier or just plain curious bystanders to click.
Part of the knee-jerk reaction negative reaction to Street is that it takes nerve, there's a potential for feedback of the unpleasant kind. Rare, but it happens. Why chance it?
Because the possible result (if we succeed) is a greater understanding of human nature, social interactions, relationships, public behavior and interesting scenerios (my favorite) that unfold before us. Those special moments, large or small, that define us. A double-take (classic!), heated conversation, quiet reflection, documenting styles and trends, real life, unrehearsed, unplanned, spontaneous and free. It's quite demanding from our (photographers) point, too. It can be, and often is, 30 minutes of boredom, followed by three seconds of fast shooting, with no second chance. These are not lakes or sunsets, our subject is people. Humans are unpredictable, that's the whole point.
Anyway, TFP,
Ron
Similar Threads 
