Thanks to everybody who has responded and especially to egordon99, whose post contained exactly the kind of info I was looking for.
Originally posted by egordon99 Will - You can "trick" Auto mode on the flash to use FEC. ...
Yeah, I stumbled on that last night while I was playing around with the flash. Setting the dials on the flash in auto mode, I realized that I could in fact lie to the flash about the camera's ISO and aperture, and a few tests showed that lying to the flash like this does cause the flash to output a different level of light. Not surprising, in retrospect, just something that I'd never thought about until last night, no doubt because I've shot thousands of client photos in P-TTL and zero actual photos in Auto. So I'm glad to have your corroboration about this, since I didn't do anything last night but play around, and I thought perhaps this idea was completely crazy. Still, I kind of wish that auto mode on the flash had an FEC control, so I could tell the truth about ISO and aperture, but still tell the flash to pull its punches.
Quote: As for fill flash, I think keeping it at Av mode/P-TTL and adjust EC and FEC as needed is the best. EC for the ambient exposure, FEC for the flash/fill exposure.
OK, thanks. This is exactly what I've been doing, so you're response basically tells me that I have not been missing anything important.
I prefer to work in hypermanual (M) mode on the K10D/K20D rather than Av. Just what I'm used to, I guess. If I have to adjust the settings - say, the camera's initial metering overexposes the sky - I find it easier to think simply in terms of shutter speed and aperture, rather than thinking in terms of EV adjustments. Hmm. Put that way, it doesn't
sound easier, does it? I guess it's that I really like to know at all times what the shutter speed is, rather than trusting the camera.
Quote: One thing to note is you most likely will need to set HSS on the flash since you most likely will be getting shutter speeds faster than 1/180s (which means you can't use Auto mode)
Right, this is another thing I've got too little experience with and I'm going to be doing some practicing in the next two days before the gig starts.
I'm attaching two shots that illustrate the effects of high-speed sync. Both shots were taken in hypermanual mode on the K20D, iso 800, f/4. (Why iso 800? Because it's not actually as bright outside as it looks in these photos.) Anyway, the differences: the first (better) shot was taken in hypermanual (M) mode, shutter speed 1/640th sec, using high-speed sync on the flash; the other shot was taken in hyperprogram (P) mode, using the standard (leading-curtain) flash setting.
The photos have been post-processed. I did this because that's what I'm interested in - the result, not the unprocessed capture. The better shot had a classic "good" histogram, no blown highlights; I was in fact able to bring up the exposure a little bit, before increasing contrast, reducing noise and sharpening. The other shot had badly blown highlights. I adjusted the "recovery" slider in Adobe Lightroom to 100 (fixes blown highlights to the extent possible). Results fairly obvious.
By the way, I'm not bothering to add a photo showing what could be done without the flash here. Using spot metering, at f/4 and iso 800, the cactus wants a shutter speed of 1/100th sec, while the window wants a shutter speed of 1/3000th sec! If I split the difference in favor of the cactus and set the shutter to 1/1000th sec, the cactus is still way underexposed and the window highlights are hopelessly blown. This simply is a tough exposure problem and fill-flash is really needed to make it work.
Quote: My 40D works more or less the same as the Pentax system. Nikon has a dedicated "fill" mode on the flash, but Canon and Pentax use Av mode for fill.
Thanks for answering that. One of these days I'm going to win the Texas lottery, buy all these cameras and be able to sit at home all day and answer my own questions. ;-)
THanks again to everybody.
Will