Originally posted by magkelly Are your techniques any different when you are not going for the water blur effect? Just curious. That effect is not one I like myself. I like the water to look real and to me that long exposure thing just makes it look too misty. What do you do if you want the water to look less romantic and more realistic? Anything different besides shutter speed? Thanks!
sure, you would simply use a faster shutter, but it must be fast enough to stop the water almost completely or will look like blurry frozen water, lol.
In the case of the above photo, you would not likely be able to get that, as it was half an hour+ after sunset and i had already cranked my ISO to 640 to maintain approx 1/2sec short blur.
However, earlier in the day it would be easy, but then you sacrifice the great twilight colors.
I do shoot both routinely, but definitely favor the look of moving water for my seascapes due to the implied motion they impart.
Here is one, this time with plenty of daylight to get a 1/500th sec. shutter. This was also about 5 minutes before i fell off a ledge and broke a toe, lol.