Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 19 Likes Search this Thread
07-08-2015, 07:40 AM - 1 Like   #16
amateur dirt farmer
Loyal Site Supporter
pepperberry farm's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: probably out in a field somewhere...
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 41,787
I purchased mine through the marketplace here, for $125; it is a stunner of a lense:





07-08-2015, 08:10 AM   #17
Senior Member
Bunch's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 283
I got my A100 for $200, but I primarily use it as the first lens of a coupled series for more extreme macro. As a stand alone, my new DFA 100 kinda blows it away.
07-08-2015, 05:59 PM   #18
Veteran Member
bluestringer's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cotton fields of South Georgia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,748
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Bunch Quote
I got my A100 for $200, but I primarily use it as the first lens of a coupled series for more extreme macro. As a stand alone, my new DFA 100 kinda blows it away.

At around 5 times the price, it should. But without photos how can we tell.
07-08-2015, 06:51 PM   #19
amateur dirt farmer
Loyal Site Supporter
pepperberry farm's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: probably out in a field somewhere...
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 41,787
more with the old 100mm f4:





07-08-2015, 07:50 PM   #20
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
arnold's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,299
A fine lens.I bought mine in the late seventies, and until my DA 35 Macro LTD arrived, it was my ultimate lens if I needed detail. My M100/4 also suffers from lamination clouding, but not to a degree I can notice the effects.
07-09-2015, 07:32 AM - 1 Like   #21
Senior Member
Bunch's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 283
QuoteOriginally posted by bluestringer Quote
At around 5 times the price, it should. But without photos how can we tell.
The DFA was only about 2.5x the price, brand new. Here are a couple shots: the bee shot is the full frame with the A 100, the robber fly is a heavy crop with the DFA.
Attached Images
   
07-09-2015, 05:38 PM   #22
Veteran Member
bluestringer's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cotton fields of South Georgia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,748
Original Poster
Great shots. The A 100 is a little more in price than the M. I have the M version which I paid only 90 dollars for. I can't see 400-500 dollars difference in my photos with a M 100 and photos shot with a DFA 100. Not with my eyes anyway.

07-09-2015, 05:58 PM   #23
Senior Member
Bunch's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 283
I shoot a lot of macro, and having a lens that goes 1:1 natively, without using tubes or coupling lenses, has been a lot more enjoyable for me. I will always keep the A 100 to use as a coupler when I want to go beyond 1:1, since the DFA has no aperture ring and can't be coupled effectively. Unless Pentax ever makes a lens like the Canon mp-e, but I doubt that will ever happen. But by itself the DFA out resolves the A100f4. I can't crop down as far and get the sharpness I get with DFA, and the rounded aperture blades make for great bokeh. Plus, ya know, WR. The cost was worth it to me.
07-10-2015, 04:47 AM   #24
Veteran Member
bluestringer's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cotton fields of South Georgia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,748
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Bunch Quote
I shoot a lot of macro, and having a lens that goes 1:1 natively, without using tubes or coupling lenses, has been a lot more enjoyable for me. I will always keep the A 100 to use as a coupler when I want to go beyond 1:1, since the DFA has no aperture ring and can't be coupled effectively. Unless Pentax ever makes a lens like the Canon mp-e, but I doubt that will ever happen. But by itself the DFA out resolves the A100f4. I can't crop down as far and get the sharpness I get with DFA, and the rounded aperture blades make for great bokeh. Plus, ya know, WR. The cost was worth it to me.


I can see the sharpness in that cropped photo of the robber fly. I shoot a lot of macro also, I have a Vivitar 55 2.8 macro that does 1:1 natively, and it's a really nice lens. I also have the M-50 f4, a nice lens but it's 1:2 also. The Vivitar does most of my 1:1 stuff, but the working distance is small. If I need more distance I'll put a 50mm tube on the 100 and get 1:1.
07-10-2015, 05:09 AM - 1 Like   #25
Senior Member
Bunch's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 283
I have that M50f4 as well. Try putting that on the end of your 100 mounted on tubes. You get about 3:1


Last edited by Bunch; 07-10-2015 at 05:43 AM.
07-10-2015, 05:51 AM   #26
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,207
Here is a complete dental macro kit. The flash works in TTL mode on the ist ds, and works OK at 1/4 on the K-01

I took this photo with the K-01 and AF360FGZ at 1/800th and f/8 , messing around with High Speed Sync and the diffuser
Attached Images
View Picture EXIF
PENTAX K-01  Photo 

Last edited by wombat2go; 07-10-2015 at 06:00 AM.
07-10-2015, 12:58 PM - 4 Likes   #27
Veteran Member
bluestringer's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Cotton fields of South Georgia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,748
Original Poster
M-100 f4 heavy crop............

Last edited by bluestringer; 03-08-2016 at 07:12 PM.
07-10-2015, 01:15 PM   #28
amateur dirt farmer
Loyal Site Supporter
pepperberry farm's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: probably out in a field somewhere...
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 41,787
QuoteOriginally posted by wombat2go Quote
Here is a complete dental macro kit. The flash works in TTL mode on the ist ds, and works OK at 1/4 on the K-01

I took this photo with the K-01 and AF360FGZ at 1/800th and f/8 , messing around with High Speed Sync and the diffuser

I take it that is a ring-flash designed for the M or A 100?
07-10-2015, 01:39 PM   #29
Senior Member




Join Date: Jan 2013
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 194
QuoteOriginally posted by pepperberry farm Quote
I take it that is a ring-flash designed for the M or A 100?
It's the AF080C. It is designed for lenses with filter sizes of 49mm or 52mm, and the A100, similarly to F, and FA versions has filter size of 58mm. Haven't tried with step-down rings, as M100 and D FA 100mm are all I have on this macro range.
07-10-2015, 02:32 PM   #30
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2011
Photos: Albums
Posts: 8,758
Is this lens similar in design to the earlier SMC Takumar 100/4? That has impressed me similarly to some of the flower and plant pictures in this thread.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
f4, lens, macro

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the Panasonic 35-100 f4-5 the same as the 06?? sapporodan Pentax Q 5 01-06-2015 01:14 AM
For Sale - Sold: Vivitar 100-200mm F4 MC Macro Focusing Zoom PK Mount (Reduced) OnTheWeb Sold Items 31 11-26-2014 02:09 PM
Macro Pentax 100 f4 macro bluestringer Post Your Photos! 2 12-28-2011 09:59 PM
Old Tokina 100-300mm F4 versus newer lenses whelmed Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 04-12-2010 10:11 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:03 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top