Originally posted by dylansalt Can you imagine the chap who just bought a Canon 40D - his camera (6 months old)has now been replaced by the 50D and in another 8 months a 60D ad finitem, ad nauseam.
Which brings us back to square one. Buy what you need, for what you want to do with your photography and what suits you. My D1 has been around for 8 plus years, still shoots at 2.74 mp and still produces very nice 8x10's. So will the the 40D. No need to keep upgrading if the camera does what you want. If it does not, then yes upgrade.
And yes i know you uesed these cameras as an example, so am I .
We spend to much time listening to the hype and not enough using the gear we have.
My K10D and istD are not the fastest in the AF area, but i have learned to work around that. Use them for certain photos and not others.Maybe not enough are willing to do that. Complaints and in action seem the norm.
Or, maybe we all need to be two system shooters. Maybe thats what the companies are hoping for.
Dave
Originally posted by dylansalt Same Nikon D80, D60, D90 D200,D300,D700 - how many more camera types do we really need??
d
As long as people buy into the more pixels is better hype, they will add more. I have proven to myself and my clients, and its me and them that matter, that more is not alwasy better.
Dave