Originally posted by joshuamcateer 4) Some of the pins match. I've tried to align the images and flick between them Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet and several of the pins are in different places.
You are showing the camera-facing flange for both the lens and TC. If there is a misalignment it would be between the camera and TC or between the TC and the lens. (The faces not shown.) In addition, the magnification is different, making image alignment difficult. As noted above, the most likely cause is a fault in the pass-through wiring of the TC, specifically the "A" contact and/or the mount flange.* The next most likely is an alignment issue at the
A little clarification in regards to detection of an "A" contact lens, the "A" contact, the "data" contact, and the other contacts. The flow goes like this:
Code:
"A" contact detected? -- NO --> display F---
|
YES -- A-series or newer lens, continue
|
"data" contact detected -- NO --> non-AF, use contact pattern for aperture
|
YES -- continue
|
Aperture information available through data contact? -- NO --> use contact pattern
|
YES --> use aperture info from data contact
The intent is to provide broad support for legacy bodies. Your macro lens will work nicely on my 1983 vintage Super Program in P and Tv modes despite the body having no data pin. If you had the FA version 100 macro, support would extend to ALL K-mount cameras in at least Av and M modes and would be fully functional on my Super Program (Av, Tv, and M modes).
In case it is not clear, successful pass-through of the "A" contact state is essential for successful use of your TC with any lens lacking an aperture ring.
Steve
* The "A" contact is detected by continuity between the center of the contact and the mount face. On older lenses, there is a pin that protrudes to close the circuit when the aperture ring is on the "A" setting. Other lenses have a spring-loaded ball with reed switch in the aperture ring mechanism to close the circuit. Either way, the acceptable dimensions for the contact (diameter, position, depth) are well-established with almost 35 years of history. The result is that physical incompatibility (misalignment) is rare and almost non-existent with unmodified devices from reputable makers.
Last edited by stevebrot; 06-19-2017 at 12:06 PM.