Originally posted by Adam It's a cool idea, and would be a prefect competition for you (or someone else) to host in the mini-challenges section. We could also turn it into a larger site event.
My only concern is that limiting things to manual focus may not have the intended effect. How about just having users do something differently- i.e. use a prime where you'd normally use a zoom, use MF when you'd normally use AF, or shoot hand-held when you'd normally use a tripod? It wouldn't have to be exactly this, but IMO the restrictions should be a bit more generic.
I am totally up for hosting
I would definitely like to have it more 'site wide' to get more people involved.
As far as the so called 'rules' are concerned I was throwing ideas out there. Naturally I am open for suggestions. I am kind of partial to maybe keeping it simple... "Manual focus action shots" or something like that.
Part of the thing here would be to have people get out of the comfort zone, maybe get exposed to new techniques, get them more exposed to (and possibly interested in) more legacy lenses or any other number of things.
It can also dispel a bunch of myths about 'auto focus', ie people using that as a crutch and thinking they 'have to have' some super advanced AF system... in the end it will put the challenge back on the photographer, not so much their gear. In the end it will help people be better photographers when they ARE using AF, or without either one.
Basic rules I lean towards (which I am still open for ideas) are:
1. NO AF!
2. Shots should be focused around or have some element of motion or movement, otherwise all the entries would be flowers (that don't move), the Grand Canyon (again not moving) or a bunch of static portraits which might be stellar but kind of defeat the idea of pushing the envelope a little.
How should we get this ball rolling?