Originally posted by K1N8 In manual bracketing 5 are possible, but not in HDR Mode, unless i overlooked a setting. Only the +/- range can be adjusted by pressing OK on the HDR tile.
The 3 exposures are saved in a single RAW DNG file, and can be separated again with DCU5 or dcraw. Aurora HDR also supports opening the combined DNG directly.
I find the in-camera HDR quite useful, as i often don't want to fiddle around with any extra software and the JPEG results just work SooC.
Ah yes, that's right. Earlier this year I investigated this mode further, I was hopeful that the RAW DNG had the hdr 'baked in', but alas it did not (at least not in LR or RawTherapee). I was further hopeful that in RawTherapee we could apply some 'motion correction' like we could with pixelshift files, that might be a really neat and welcome option for hdr users. But again this didn't work. I don't even think RawTherapee could separate the three RAW files, or perhaps they all had the same exposure etc...? Can't recall.
I came to the conclusion it really is useful only for the Jpg SOOC types (which is perfectly fine and reasonable), i just had hoped perhaps that somehow the 3 RAW files at different exposures were merged into one RAW file that has those 'blends baked in' and thus we could get a singular RAW file that had the hdr applied from which we could work from (more maneurvability than the Jpg, such as better dynamic range and WB to work with etc). I think what I wanted was probably an oxymoron and flies in the face of the point of RAW hehe.
I favoured HDR 1, Auto felt too random and the other two too extreme in effect.
Originally posted by stevebrot Two more things:
1) Use the default bracket order unless you have compelling reason to set it otherwise. Strange things happen when the order changes (rat hole topic...just take it at face value).
2) Be aware that the unexpected may happen if the bracket might result in settings beyond the available range for camera or lens.
Steve
My bracketing order does go -2 -1 0 +1 +2, I find that the easiest way when dealing with the files which one is '0', it's the middle one
Originally posted by sergysergy Nothing that exotic of that hasn't been done 1000 time before
. It is Antelope Canyon. I have been reading about the conditions there and that is what I would expect. I don't have the time nor the patience to do a photography tour so hand-held pictures it is.
Using a K-1
Sounds great. Maybe even a monopod might help for stability. I have not seen any results from aperture bracketing hdr images so I cannot say as to whether this works well or not. I recall the very first time it happened that it was an odd occurrence, I thought it would be a mess to try and get a shot out of 5 images using different apertures, but maybe it works!
Depending on the lens used, and if you can have some kind of stability/bracing going on, you might find 1/10 fine to work with. Software does an amazing job these days of aligning images, tripods help but you don't need them for bracketing always.These shots were all done handheld, 5 bracketing (shutter speed changing) and processed in PS;
Search: superresolution | Flickr
Of course I had more light available than you.. Good luck!