Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-27-2019, 03:50 AM   #16
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 20,862
I think the problem comes in if (like with the DA *55) you have a hood designed for APS-C and shoot the lens on full frame. You do get some vignetting with the hood, but typically a hood just blocks light that is actually out of the field of view from causing flaring.

11-27-2019, 04:07 AM - 1 Like   #17
Moderator
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,298
Unless you're shooting slide film for analogue projection, who cares about 1/3 of a stop?
12-02-2019, 10:12 PM - 1 Like   #18
Forum Member
danielwritesback's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Oklahoma, U.S.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 76
QuoteOriginally posted by Karen the Star Quote
On some camera hands book that tell me a hood will decrease light value about 0.3 aperture, somebody says there is no effect at all. Which one is real?
Lens hood = no change
Lens hood + 81A filter = 1/3rd stop

If the camera handbook had been translated between languages, or compressed, then the 0.3 aperture surely came from a discussion of filters.

Here is the likely confusion:
You don't need a filter when using a lens hood, but...
You need a lens hood when using an uncoated filter.


I suspect that the handbook wasn't clear about the equipment and scenarios:
The exposure correction (for filter) is automatic/included with the in-camera meter of your slr/dslr/mirrorless-digital camera; however...
The exposure correction (for filter) is manual with the external/pocket meter for your antique TLR/View/Rangefinder film camera.
Example of pocket meter:

Using a device like this is the only time you need to worry about the exposure compensation (for a filter). This applies to an antique camera, or even a new camera if its light meter were either inaccurate or inoperable. Then, a filter is in front of the lens, but not in front of the external light meter. That's when you compensate for that specific difference, manually.


Or, in QA form:
What is the lens hood for? Because of the filter.
What is the exposure compensation for? A filter.
Does a lens hood need exposure compensation? No.
Does a lens hood need a filter? No.
Does a filter need a lens hood? Yes.


P.S.
If an explanation from me did better than the handbook, then...
A more reliable handbook is probably available.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, decrease, decrease value, hood, hood really decrease, lens hood, light, photography, technique, value
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does that really add more value? Vasyl General Photography 99 11-04-2019 12:52 PM
Pentax-DA* 16-50 Screw Drive converted lens value increase or decrease Swissidoodle Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 15 12-01-2017 07:26 PM
Why does a lens' ability to focus decrease over time? dflorez Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 13 11-17-2015 11:03 AM
I don't see the value of rating value in reviews. skyoftexas General Photography 9 11-07-2015 04:35 PM
How (DSLR) AF Errors Can Decrease Effective Resolution? RiceHigh Pentax DSLR Discussion 0 12-04-2006 06:10 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top