Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 3 Likes Search this Thread
04-08-2009, 07:42 AM   #1
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 20
getting started: infrared?

I am looking for some information/tips for getting started in IR photography. Ive seen some amazing photos and would like to try my hand at the technique. The trouble is that through my browsing of the internet, I haven't been able to find a true tutorial or how-to. All of the information I come across is conceptual or explains how it works (buy a digital camera, buy filter, shoot, PP).

Well I have my K100DS and kit lens (18-55) as well as a Hoya R72 filter. All of the photos I have taken are saturated red and I cannot clean it up regardless of how much PP i do.

I have a feeling that my WB is the problem. In an attempt to correct this I put the filter on the camera and tried to do a custom WB off my lawn. The problem is that the custom WB doesnt take. I get an 'N.G.' error.

Can someone point me in the direction of at least getting something that I can work with?

04-08-2009, 07:58 AM   #2
Veteran Member
OregonJim's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posts: 1,327
You can't get a valid white balance through the filter. You also can't use the meter to calculate exposure. What sort of exposure times have you been using? Usually, you'll need to be in the "several seconds" range. You will always get the red tint unless you physically remove the internal IR blocking filter and replace it with a hot mirror filter (either internally or on the lens). But then your camera will only be good for infrared - no more "normal" pictures. Most people reduce the image to B&W before PP.

Last edited by OregonJim; 04-08-2009 at 08:06 AM.
04-08-2009, 08:20 AM   #3
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,965
The easiest thing to do is to put on the filter, then shoot B&W if your camera will do it, or convert to B&W (see your manual for B&W or Digital Filter) after the shot.

Then apply whatever tinting you like. Picasa is sufficient to convert to B&W & tint.

Sometimes people use an image manipulator like Image J & swap the red & blue channels.

My Pentax K100D will not shoot B&W but the Digital Filter item on the playback menu converts to B&W nicely.

Dave
04-08-2009, 08:24 AM   #4
Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Wheatfield's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The wheatfields of Canada
Posts: 15,987
QuoteOriginally posted by ixc Quote
I am looking for some information/tips for getting started in IR photography. Ive seen some amazing photos and would like to try my hand at the technique. The trouble is that through my browsing of the internet, I haven't been able to find a true tutorial or how-to. All of the information I come across is conceptual or explains how it works (buy a digital camera, buy filter, shoot, PP).

Well I have my K100DS and kit lens (18-55) as well as a Hoya R72 filter. All of the photos I have taken are saturated red and I cannot clean it up regardless of how much PP i do.

I have a feeling that my WB is the problem. In an attempt to correct this I put the filter on the camera and tried to do a custom WB off my lawn. The problem is that the custom WB doesnt take. I get an 'N.G.' error.

Can someone point me in the direction of at least getting something that I can work with?
Try to find an old Canon G1 camera. I did some wonderful IR with one of those.
The problem you are going to have with more modern cameras is that they put IR filters in front of the sensor.
If you realy want to do IR, you need to have a camera that doesn't have the filter in place. This is a fairly expensive and permanent conversion.

04-08-2009, 08:33 AM   #5
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,965
A DIY conversion of some P&S cameras is practical. You can just remove the "hot mirror" IR filter. This changes the optical path length but that doesn't matter as auto-focusing takes place on the sensor that records the image.

I've done this with my Fuji F20 and am pleased with the result. I use external UV, VIS (Hot Mirror), and IR filters to select the band I'm shooting. It works well and exposure times for VIS & IR are comparable; there's not much to see in UV.

Iowa Dave

PS Removing the Hot Mirror on a DSLR requires replacing it with a clear sheet of glass the same thickness to prevent focus shift problems.
04-08-2009, 10:06 AM   #6
ixc
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 20
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by OregonJim Quote
You can't get a valid white balance through the filter. You also can't use the meter to calculate exposure. What sort of exposure times have you been using? Usually, you'll need to be in the "several seconds" range. You will always get the red tint unless you physically remove the internal IR blocking filter and replace it with a hot mirror filter (either internally or on the lens). But then your camera will only be good for infrared - no more "normal" pictures. Most people reduce the image to B&W before PP.
From browsing over IR threads here I was under the impression that it was possible to simply use the R72 filter. I do not want to go completely IR at this time. Was I wrong?

I have been calculating the exposure by framing the scene and setting the aperature to f8+. I then would change the shutter speed to net me +1 or so exposure. after I had that set, I would slip on the filter and press the shutter release.

Here is an example of what I am getting consistently with this method:


ISO 200, 20mm, 1/4s shutter speed, f11, auto WB.

I came across a blog that had similar issues with the red channel and his solution was to pull a custom WB of green through the IR filter (which prompted my question)
04-08-2009, 11:12 AM   #7
Veteran Member
OregonJim's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posts: 1,327
QuoteOriginally posted by ixc Quote
From browsing over IR threads here I was under the impression that it was possible to simply use the R72 filter. I do not want to go completely IR at this time. Was I wrong?

I have been calculating the exposure by framing the scene and setting the aperature to f8+. I then would change the shutter speed to net me +1 or so exposure. after I had that set, I would slip on the filter and press the shutter release.

I came across a blog that had similar issues with the red channel and his solution was to pull a custom WB of green through the IR filter (which prompted my question)
Here is a basic reference to get you started.

04-08-2009, 11:34 AM   #8
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,965
Here's the result of in-camera B&W conversion with an un-modified K100D; I just put on the filter & shot the photo hand-held using Av mode (no preset focus, etc, just pick up the camera and shoot.)


It might help to add some exposure compensation.

Iowa Dave
04-08-2009, 12:47 PM   #9
ixc
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 20
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by OregonJim Quote
Here is a basic reference to get you started.

thanks for this. I just did a quick test shot w/ the following settings:

a. custom WB of grass (non filter)
b. F8
c. 2s exposure time

While the normal preview of the image is pretty washed out, flipping it to BW restores all clarity. This will definitely give me a starting point.
04-08-2009, 03:16 PM - 1 Like   #10
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
xs400's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,939
I used my K100D for IR photography a couple of years ago and had pretty good results. I wrote up a description of my post processing technique so I wouldn't forget what i did. If interested, take a look at Frank's Intro to Digital Infrared Photography to see what i did.

Here's an example of what i was able to achieve using the K100D + DA 18-55mm + R72 filter + Photoshop CS2



Frank
04-08-2009, 04:27 PM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2007
Location: York Region Canada
Posts: 641
QuoteOriginally posted by Wheatfield Quote
Try to find an old Canon G1 camera. I did some wonderful IR with one of those.
The problem you are going to have with more modern cameras is that they put IR filters in front of the sensor.
If you realy want to do IR, you need to have a camera that doesn't have the filter in place. This is a fairly expensive and permanent conversion.
I picked up a converted G3 of ebay last year for about $250

Does a great job.

Dave
04-08-2009, 05:59 PM   #12
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,263
my 4 cents worth (inflation)

Virtually all digicams have sensors that are sensitive to IR. Virtually all have "hot filters" in front of the sensor, to block the IR. There are exceptions. It's common to just mount a 720nm IR filter on an unmodified cam and shoot LOOOOOONG exposures. There are tricks.

Sony "NightShot" cams (video and PNS) have a lever that flips the hot.filter away. But since IR penetrates cotton and Sony doesn't want to be known for making Xray cams, there are severe restrictions on speed and aperture (slow and wide-open only!) built into the cams. The trick: on my 5mp Sony DSC-V1, I use ND and/or IR (780, 900, 930, 1000nm) and/or deep red (#25) filters. These allow handheld daylight work, at about f/2.8-4 and no faster than 1/50 shutter.

(IR filters: the higher the number, the more visible light is blocked. 720nm looks deep red; 1000nm looks black. Low-number filters are easier to use but diminish the IR effect.)

As mentioned, one can buy modified PNS cams on eBay that have the hot.filter removed and replaced either with plain glass of the same thickness, or, more commonly, with a 720nm IR filter. My 5mp Minolta F300 cost about US$300. (More megapickles = more money.) You can do it yourself IF YOU ARE BRAVE. I attempted such surgery on a couple cheap web cams and killed them both. Oops.

If shooting LOOOOOOONG exposures on your dSLR isn't appealing, you can remove and replace the hot.filter, or have it done by someone who knows what they're doing and probably charges above US$500. For any normal-light work with that cam, you'll then need to place an IR-block filter on the lens.

Fuji and Sigma make 'forensic' dSLRs (I think they both take Nikon lenses) where the hot.filter is easily removed and replaced with filters that isolate any portion of the UV-visible-IR spectrum. These are used for criminal and scientific work, and artistry, and aren't hideously expensive, although a full set of filters ain't cheap.

And that's the skinny on commercial-grade IR hardware. Have fun.
04-08-2009, 06:20 PM   #13
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
xs400's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,939
QuoteOriginally posted by RioRico Quote
If shooting LOOOOOOONG exposures on your dSLR isn't appealing, you can remove and replace the hot.filter,
The K100D is particularly good for IR. With the R72 filter, exposures are longer than regular exposures, but not LOOOOOOOONG. The shot below was shot at 1/8 sec at f/6.7.

04-08-2009, 09:06 PM   #14
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,340
QuoteOriginally posted by ixc Quote
...I have a feeling that my WB is the problem. In an attempt to correct this I put the filter on the camera and tried to do a custom WB off my lawn. The problem is that the custom WB doesnt take. I get an 'N.G.' error.

Can someone point me in the direction of at least getting something that I can work with?
I know someone else has said you can't do this, but I was able to get the grass thing to work just a few days ago. I think it helped keep the red channel from clipping. It took several tries to get the custom WB to work, and it ended up at 3600ēK. My other idea was to set the WB to tungsten, the closest thing to the 2000ēK I usually end up choosing. That can help when you haven't got green available. I haven't tried this yet. I don't claim to know what I'm doing, but I seem to be getting better.
04-08-2009, 10:15 PM   #15
Veteran Member
OregonJim's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posts: 1,327
QuoteOriginally posted by Just1MoreDave Quote
I know someone else has said you can't do this, but I was able to get the grass thing to work just a few days ago. I think it helped keep the red channel from clipping. It took several tries to get the custom WB to work, and it ended up at 3600ēK. My other idea was to set the WB to tungsten, the closest thing to the 2000ēK I usually end up choosing. That can help when you haven't got green available. I haven't tried this yet. I don't claim to know what I'm doing, but I seem to be getting better.
I was the one who said that. To expand a little, the camera is likely to give an "N.G." error ("No Good") when attempting to capture a custom white balance through an IR filter. Having said that, the R72 filter is 'iffy' - since it extends pretty far below IR and into the visible red region, you 'might' be able to get the camera to lock WB if you point at a bright, pure green/blue surface. But any of the higher numbered filters (low pass cutoff above 720nm) will most definately confuse the camera's custom WB. You'll have to set it manually in camera - adjusting in PP won't help as you'll have already blown out the red channel.

Last edited by OregonJim; 04-08-2009 at 10:22 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, custom, filter, photography, photos, pp, wb

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting Started... jess Pentax Medium Format 15 10-06-2009 06:00 PM
Haven't even started :) kewpie-o Welcomes and Introductions 3 02-13-2009 04:29 PM
Just Getting Started... jocko_nc Post Your Photos! 0 07-01-2008 10:48 AM
Where it all started... quickpix Post Your Photos! 0 01-20-2008 09:08 PM
Getting started wipearl Pentax DSLR Discussion 3 04-14-2007 09:14 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top