Originally posted by BigMackCam For the RAW files, everything is the same size - you just need to reset any develop settings in Lightroom to remove the crop and anything else (also remember to remove any sharpening and noise reduction applied by default when you do this). I've downloaded the files and I've been working on them
See below thumbnails in LR for all 24 images (12 for K-1, 12 for K-1II) in LR6, following develop settings reset.
I knew it was something simple I was over looking.
This isn't a bad little test scene. It would be nice instead of the wide shot of the soft box to fill the frame with just the scene. A few pixel shift images that way from ISO range 100, 3200, 8000.
To my eye the Mark II takes the image quality to a different level. Looking forward to having my K-1 upgraded.
Now to just get Ricoh/Pentax to allow us to reprocess K-1 images in the K-1 MkII to apply the Accelerator Unit to those files. :^)
---------- Post added 04-28-18 at 11:10 PM ----------
Originally posted by Michaelina2 You are aware that LR needs to "recognize" a camera's precise make and model in order to work with it in a way that produces a fair representative image. The K-1 is a "recognized" camera by LR. LR's built-in array of unique and specialized profiles are time and taste tested to play nice with the K-1 images.
The K-1 MkII is NOT recognized (yet). Being "unrecognized", K-1 MkII images opened in LR are assigned a generic color palette and other settings that might produce wonky results.
Is it possible that getting in a huff over perceived differences between the way LR currently treats K-1 MkII images and any other camera's images is a bit premature?
Just askin'... M
K-1 MkII is being assigned the embedded profile the camera produces. You can switch the K-1 images to the embedded profile which brings them very much in line with each other.