Hrm. 'Most Important Camera' of 2009.
'Importance' is always an interesting criterion for anything.
If we go by present senses of what'll be most influential, from how things seem in the present, (for weal or woe) I'd have to go with the Olympus.
But I'm unconvinced. Assuming this has other intents behind it.
The big name brands are pretty much refinements of existing developments.
The Leica is ...Maybe proving you can actually *have* such a rangefinder with digital. From a small, high-quality company.
The Pentax and Sony are both kind of saying, 'Yes, you can has what you film types used to take for granted, too.'
Accepting my existing biases, (which are why I'm here in the first place) I'd have to say, either the Pentax, (for putting together the enthusiast-level camera in this way, and successfully breaking the usual scheme of 'what-things-cost' ) or the Olympus (for coming across as really revolutionary. )
The Sony and Leica are sentimental favorites: (The Sony would get more consideration if all the cool stuff weren't actually in last year's model: they just stripped down somewhat, and compromised on the finder, which to me was The Thing About A900s. If they hadn't done that but still made a modular-grip model... might be different. )
The Olympus could be the origin of a whole genre of cameras, or like the original Pen, kind of be a neat thing in its own world a while. Much buzz... But is this the important one. Is this the 'Pen F?' and where would that go?
.
The Pentax could be like what I said when I got my K20d. "Great. Now put this in metal."
Tough call, in an objective sense. 'Important to *me* ...less so.
Last edited by Ratmagiclady; 11-11-2009 at 02:01 PM.