Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-20-2010, 12:12 AM   #1
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 497
Comments on the PP of this portrait, please
Lens: DA 35mm f2.4 Camera: Pentax K10D Photo Location: Oulu, Finland ISO: 100 Shutter Speed: 1/90s Aperture: F4 

I took this shot (and plenty of others, but only this had potential) of my girlfriend around sunset. It's metered for the sunset, making my girlfriend here around 4 stops underexposed! I used some tricks like merging two outputs from Lightroom in Photomatix to get this shot. Do you think it works? I've played around with it so much I'm blind by now. Obviously it's such heavy PP that if that's not your thing you're not going to like it... Still, criticism welcome.



Here's the two versions from Lightroom to show the problem...






Last edited by brkl; 12-22-2010 at 04:20 AM.
12-20-2010, 06:07 AM   #2
Veteran Member
netuser's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Azores Islands, Portugal
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,236
Metering to the sunsed and use a bit of flash was not an option?
12-20-2010, 06:25 AM   #3
Veteran Member
timh's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wales
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 445
She's a nice well-defined shape (no flowing hair, for example) so you could develop twice and manually mask & merge the two images in photoshop (or PSP, GIMP, etc).

Alternatively, developing it 3-4 times at a range of exposures then feeding the bitmaps back into some HDR software might help you, if you can keep the "HDR look" to a minimum.

(edit: I just noticed that second suggestion is what you already did.. oops.)

Last edited by timh; 12-20-2010 at 09:05 AM.
12-20-2010, 07:06 AM   #4
Veteran Member
stanic's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zakopane
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 385
it works for me, maybe she is a bit oversaturated?
as timh suggested, merging and masking the two last images provided would do the trick

12-20-2010, 07:31 AM   #5
Veteran Member
timh's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wales
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 445
Or post the raw file and turn it into a challenge.
12-20-2010, 07:44 AM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
slowpez's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Carolina, USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 18,406
Keeping in mind that I have no idea what I am talking about when it comes to this type of PP; I like the final result but..... I think the background turned out fine (at least for me) but she looks much more natural in the underexposed sky shot. Is there anyway to combine what you have done to the sky with the middle picture without touching her in PP? Hope this helps.
12-20-2010, 03:04 PM   #7
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,521
In my un-humble opinion, you did a fantastic job.
12-20-2010, 07:37 PM   #8
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
BigDave's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,484
IMHO, I think the face, hair and scarf are now just too warm. Masking the face and adjusting the color balance for just the face would probably do the trick! Certainly, keep the sky!

Regards,

12-20-2010, 09:15 PM   #9
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,521
"He was just blinded by the light
Cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night
Blinded by the light
Mama always told me not to look into the sights of the sun
Oh but mama that's where the fun is!" Blinded By The Light Bruce Springsteen
12-20-2010, 09:59 PM   #10
Ash
Community Manager
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,622
Good work getting the result you wanted with the underexposed original.
Indeed next time you do this kind of shoot, consider fill flash to balance the ambient light.
That way you get good exposure of the subject, and the right exposure of the background sky.
12-20-2010, 10:26 PM   #11
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
grey goat's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spring Green, WI
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 747
Hey, Brkl.

Ash is right about that being a prime time to use fill flash, I think.

But I think you did a great job merging the two exposures.

Others might have good points about the color balance and over-saturation. But that seems an easy fix if you want to go that route.

Still, the end product looks good, and it doesn't look heavily post-processed to my eye.

Nath
12-21-2010, 06:17 PM   #12
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
K(s)evin's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 322
QuoteOriginally posted by Sparkle Quote
Blinded By The Light Bruce Springsteen
Your comment is irrelevant and your info is incorrect. Springsteen? Come on!
12-21-2010, 06:27 PM   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oklahoma USA
Posts: 1,704
The first photo doesn't display for me, but I'd be very happy with the 2nd one as-is.

Paul
12-22-2010, 04:15 AM   #14
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 497
Original Poster
Thanks for the comments, guys! The first photo broke because I changed it. I applied a brush to her face that lowered saturation a bit.

I tried to do masking & merging but that ended up with a faker looking picture. Plus, there's some hair that's impossible to mask. Also, when I was taking the pictures I did switch to a fill flash, but those shots just weren't very good.

Thanks, people!
12-26-2010, 05:13 PM   #15
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scotland
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 348
I like it, i think you did a great job of combining both images .

If i was to do anything it would be to change the color balance on her just a little (make it a little cooler), and reduce the saturation a bit on her hair/scarf (they look the same color almost but in the 2nd photo you can see a distinct difference. Id then lighten both sides of her jacket a little (the center seems fine) to make it look more like the 2nd photo.

But good work and a great work around to the problem you had with fill flash
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
critique, girlfriend, lightroom, photography, pp, shot, sunset
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When you take a picture in a portrait shot do you rotate it back to portrait and save rustynail925 Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 24 08-22-2010 08:29 AM
I need your comments please Naim Khan Pentax DSLR Discussion 14 04-24-2010 06:01 PM
People portrait attempt - appreciate comments jon.partsch Photo Critique 9 11-13-2009 08:23 PM
Another portrait shot. Comments welcome. snappy Post Your Photos! 8 06-02-2009 07:44 PM
Comments Welcome AmdamJayne Post Your Photos! 2 06-06-2007 10:14 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:43 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top