People Film in studio

Svyatosha · 04-17-2011, 11:07 AM

Rory · 04-17-2011, 12:55 PM

You've got a great idea on the first one. Two simple critiques. First is that it looks like focus is on her knees. It seems like her face is a little OOF. Have to see a larger image. Secondly, there's something a bit awkward about the pose. I think it's because both her elbows are locked. She seems uncomfortable. Maybe sitting on the bottom one of the steps with her elbow proping her up on the top step with the right arm, left arm draped across her thighs casually. Not sure.

Second one, the lighting is just not flattering. It highlights the small imperfections, along with the fact that she's shaking her head. A bit under exposed on the subject, also.

Looks like you've got some creative ideas. That's a big part of it. Look forward to seeing more.

Svyatosha · 04-17-2011, 02:14 PM

Thanks Rory!
There are more pictures will come later. Work (

**Ash** · 04-21-2011, 08:46 PM

I'm sure the original images would be sharper than what these scans appear to be.
These are beautiful and candid poses of very pretty women.
I like your arrangements in the images.

#1 is attractive but Rory's comments are spot on. It also appears like the image has been shrunk in the horizontal aspect, perhaps. There looks to be a little too much lighting everywhere in the portrait and a resultant overexposure, whilst #2 is indeed a little the other way in the focal point.

K-9 · 04-24-2011, 11:30 AM

Hard to judge exact sharpness and exposure from film scans, so I won't touch on that.

Shot 1 - overall pretty decent studio look, but watch that awkwardly placed lower leg. Makes the knee look odd.
Shot 2 - angle of lighting doesn't do her face justice; adds puffiness look to below her eyes
Shot 3 - an ok candid, but position of fingers looks awkward
Shot 4- probably the best of the four; I like the blue background; I'd crop the tan blanket out of the lower corner

harleyquin · 05-03-2011, 05:34 AM

sweet girl! nice photo.

04-17-2011, 02:14 PM	#3
Svyatosha Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Kaliningrad Photos: Albums Posts: 28 Original Poster	Thanks Rory! There are more pictures will come later. Work ( Last edited by Svyatosha; 04-17-2011 at 02:25 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Pentax 645 (Film)	mike_lambert	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	5	11-15-2009 11:11 AM
Greyish results from my Black/White film ?	tuintu	Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras	19	08-24-2009 09:13 AM
Newbie SLR film and film develop qestion	winglik	Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras	11	06-15-2009 03:13 AM
Questions on studio compatibility with Pentax. Help	SuperAkuma	Photographic Technique	20	03-27-2009 03:45 PM
Best film for medium format studio	CapitaineAbitibi	Pentax Medium Format	10	03-19-2008 07:20 AM

04-17-2011, 11:07 AM	#1
Svyatosha Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Kaliningrad Photos: Albums Posts: 28	Film in studio Lens: 77 ltd Camera: Pentax Me Se ISO: 200 Shutter Speed: 1/90s Aperture: F8

04-17-2011, 12:55 PM	#2
Rory Inactive Account Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Chicago Photos: Gallery Posts: 672	You've got a great idea on the first one. Two simple critiques. First is that it looks like focus is on her knees. It seems like her face is a little OOF. Have to see a larger image. Secondly, there's something a bit awkward about the pose. I think it's because both her elbows are locked. She seems uncomfortable. Maybe sitting on the bottom one of the steps with her elbow proping her up on the top step with the right arm, left arm draped across her thighs casually. Not sure. Second one, the lighting is just not flattering. It highlights the small imperfections, along with the fact that she's shaking her head. A bit under exposed on the subject, also. Looks like you've got some creative ideas. That's a big part of it. Look forward to seeing more.

04-21-2011, 08:46 PM	#4
Ash Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Toowoomba, Queensland Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 23,920	I'm sure the original images would be sharper than what these scans appear to be. These are beautiful and candid poses of very pretty women. I like your arrangements in the images. #1 is attractive but Rory's comments are spot on. It also appears like the image has been shrunk in the horizontal aspect, perhaps. There looks to be a little too much lighting everywhere in the portrait and a resultant overexposure, whilst #2 is indeed a little the other way in the focal point.

04-24-2011, 11:30 AM	#5
K-9 Veteran Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: USA Photos: Albums Posts: 1,971	Hard to judge exact sharpness and exposure from film scans, so I won't touch on that. Shot 1 - overall pretty decent studio look, but watch that awkwardly placed lower leg. Makes the knee look odd. Shot 2 - angle of lighting doesn't do her face justice; adds puffiness look to below her eyes Shot 3 - an ok candid, but position of fingers looks awkward Shot 4- probably the best of the four; I like the blue background; I'd crop the tan blanket out of the lower corner

05-03-2011, 05:34 AM	#6
harleyquin Junior Member Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 25	sweet girl! nice photo.