Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-20-2008, 08:21 AM   #1
Pentaxian
Moderator Emeritus




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,643
Forgot to check the settings DUH....

I was shooting a business meeting the other night and had manually set the WB on the camera for the varied indoor lighting. So last night I went out and did a little shooting for myself (not much of that lately!!) Maybe it was the cold or I was rushing a little for the fading light but I forgot to reset the WB and high ISO I was using earlier. Stupid errors.

Anyway these are "recovery" efforts in PP to clean up the shots and see if it was salvageable. It was an amazing sunset with great clouds and colour.

Curious what you guys think. They were taken about 10 minutes after sunset with dim light. Sigma 70-200 f2.8 ISO800 1/500th, f8 Shot in manual and underexposed 4 stops.


Taken on the Charlottetown waterfront along the boardwalk

Name:  IMGP6208_filtered small.jpg
Views: 333
Size:  33.2 KB

This was just foolin' around with another shot that just had too much noise due to the underexposure and high ISO. So now it's rendered to look like a B&W oil painting.

Name:  IMGP6218 lighthouse oil small.jpg
Views: 356
Size:  39.7 KB


Last edited by Peter Zack; 01-20-2008 at 08:51 AM.
01-21-2008, 07:41 AM   #2
Pentaxian
Moderator Emeritus




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,643
Original Poster
Well the responses I guess answers that question....
01-21-2008, 06:06 PM   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,488
I think the PP recovery worked just fine but I think the composition could be a little stronger (the horizon is getting pretty close to the middle of the frame and the tower is a bit to far to the left). Still a nice image.

The B&W oil painting conversion is an interesting idea, I don't think I've ever seen an actual B&W oil painting but it just doesn't work for me particularly when the colour in the original are so warm.

Last edited by Mike L; 01-21-2008 at 06:13 PM.
01-21-2008, 07:30 PM   #4
Pentaxian
SpecialK's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,482
QuoteOriginally posted by Mike L Quote
I think the PP recovery worked just fine but I think the composition could be a little stronger (the horizon is getting pretty close to the middle of the frame and the tower is a bit to far to the left). Still a nice image.

The B&W oil painting conversion is an interesting idea, I don't think I've ever seen an actual B&W oil painting but it just doesn't work for me particularly when the colour in the original are so warm.

Some shots work fine with the middle horizon. I think you meant "right", not "left" for the tower?

The first one is kind of nice. Second does not do much for me.

01-22-2008, 06:01 AM   #5
Pentaxian
Moderator Emeritus




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,643
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Mike L Quote
I think the PP recovery worked just fine but I think the composition could be a little stronger (the horizon is getting pretty close to the middle of the frame and the tower is a bit to far to the left). Still a nice image.

The B&W oil painting conversion is an interesting idea, I don't think I've ever seen an actual B&W oil painting but it just doesn't work for me particularly when the colour in the original are so warm.

Thanks Mike, Neither have I but I just thought I'd have a little fun with the image and see what happened. As for the composition of this first shot, there was a house quite close to the lighthouse that just didn't work well in the shot. I wanted to get as much of the great sky captured. Maybe a bit too much and some cropping would balance it better.
01-22-2008, 06:03 AM   #6
Pentaxian
Moderator Emeritus




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,643
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by SpecialK Quote
Some shots work fine with the middle horizon. I think you meant "right", not "left" for the tower?

The first one is kind of nice. Second does not do much for me.
Thanks for the thoughts. I think I'll go there again and re-shoot with the settings corrected!
01-22-2008, 07:40 AM   #7
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: fla
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 375
lo peter......i actually like the shot.....the mood is somber, in spite of colors, it's brrrrr......i don't really feel a problem with the comp' though i would ( for me only )...prob crop a bit from the bottom......the reason the comp doesn't bother me is that the first thing grabbing my eye is the lighthouse light with the eye then falling to the black diagonal below the light, leading me to the diagonal of the foreground, which in turn leads me to the rectangular white shape repeated by the cloud above it, and then on out of the scene.....wrks for me. have a good 'un

01-22-2008, 09:31 AM   #8
Veteran Member
JCSullivan's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Windsor, Canada
Posts: 3,056
Peter, it is way too dark for MY liking but then that's me.
01-22-2008, 05:18 PM   #9
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,488
QuoteOriginally posted by Peter Zack Quote
Thanks Mike, Neither have I but I just thought I'd have a little fun with the image and see what happened. As for the composition of this first shot, there was a house quite close to the lighthouse that just didn't work well in the shot. I wanted to get as much of the great sky captured. Maybe a bit too much and some cropping would balance it better.
I was actually suggesting that you should have considered moving the horizon down towards the bottom third so you would get more of the great sky and a little less of the foreground.
01-22-2008, 05:46 PM   #10
Veteran Member
vievetrick's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Easthampton - Massachusetts - USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,183
I really like the color version. Great recovery
01-22-2008, 07:37 PM   #11
m8o
Veteran Member
m8o's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 40°-55'-44" N / 73°-24'-07" W [on LI]
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,092
I think the 'bandless' low light recovery was quite successful! I guess my style would be for a bit more brightness / exposure and with that, maybe less contrast then (I tried it out in Lightroom and that's what I needed to do ), but I wasn't there so I don't know if that's how the scene really was or not. Fantastic sky and well composed.
01-24-2008, 05:05 AM   #12
Senior Member




Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne (Cranbourne) Australia
Posts: 121
I like it but I do think it just needs that little extra - being dark I think if the lighthouse light had more illumination it would give the image more impact

cheer
Keith
01-24-2008, 05:37 AM   #13
Pentaxian
Moderator Emeritus




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,643
Original Poster
Thanks everyone for the comments and suggestions. I'm going to go back and rework the RAW image and see if there's another way to brighten the shot without the huge amount of noise being visible. It is dark and I'll see what can be done about that.

Keith, the lighthouse light is actually dim from that angle. It doesn't rotate like the old style ones. It's a set of 2 lighthouses that the mariner would line up as they approach the harbour entrance. I could artificially brighten it but that's not the real scene.

Check settings in future... [bangs head on table]
01-24-2008, 07:16 AM   #14
Veteran Member
JCSullivan's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Windsor, Canada
Posts: 3,056
QuoteQuote:
Check settings in future... [bangs head on table]
I've done that so often I got calluses
01-26-2008, 02:11 PM   #15
Veteran Member
Fl_Gulfer's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida Gulfer
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,054
The B&W shot looks fake. the other looks out of focus or something. I guess it was the shot being at dusk. because I know that lens is suppose to be a awesome one.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
critique, iso, light, night, photography, shot, sunset, wb

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
duh film loading moment k100d Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 21 03-22-2009 11:27 AM
DUH! You learn and live. SuperAkuma Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 27 03-11-2009 03:24 PM
Duh! trishytee Site Suggestions and Help 4 01-14-2009 06:09 PM
Rotating front element DUH! dws1117 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 04-28-2008 05:13 PM
Well Ed, Duh-Huh Ed in GA Pentax DSLR Discussion 1 01-05-2008 03:01 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top