Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 5 Likes Search this Thread
12-08-2014, 07:05 PM - 1 Like   #16
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,817
1. No, if you put the camera on relatively flat surface, put the beanbag down first, then the camera.

4. Hit up your local used camera stores, I paid about $50 for a used Pentax-A SMC F1.8
.
5. Good luck, and don't be afraid to experiment.

12-10-2014, 11:12 AM   #17
Forum Member




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 93
lens under $50

lots of used manual lenses on ebay. Doesn't have to be a "Pentax" brand lens. just make sure it has the Pentax bayonet mount and consult online lens reviews to see if it is worth your time.
12-10-2014, 02:14 PM   #18
Forum Member




Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 87
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by soycory Quote
lots of used manual lenses on ebay. Doesn't have to be a "Pentax" brand lens. just make sure it has the Pentax bayonet mount and consult online lens reviews to see if it is worth your time.


Is it a good buy at $15?

I am not quite sure how to operate a manual lens.

This video seems to be easy.

12-10-2014, 05:51 PM   #19
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
Otis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis Fan
Loyal Site Supporter
clackers's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Albums
Posts: 16,397
With a tripod, even the kit lens will be fine.


You trade off shutter time for ISO and aperture, which can stay optimized for quality - ISO 100 and f8.


This is eight seconds:




12-10-2014, 07:09 PM   #20
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,817
Good night scenic shooting requires low ISO's, long exposures, a stable shooting platform, and patience. As the photo above shoes, long exposures can be great.

Low-light shooting, like a close-up of a face blowing out a candle, is where you could use higher ISO's and faster shutter speeds, because your subject is mostly illuminated, and you have few purely dark areas to mess with the metering. Even then, lower ISO is always better fro image quality.

As for your manual lens, $50 is a good deal, it looks like it goes to f2, which is fast enough.
12-11-2014, 12:07 AM   #21
Forum Member




Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 87
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by clackers Quote
With a tripod, even the kit lens will be fine.


You trade off shutter time for ISO and aperture, which can stay optimized for quality - ISO 100 and f8.


This is eight seconds:

QuoteOriginally posted by robgski Quote
Good night scenic shooting requires low ISO's, long exposures, a stable shooting platform, and patience. As the photo above shoes, long exposures can be great.

Low-light shooting, like a close-up of a face blowing out a candle, is where you could use higher ISO's and faster shutter speeds, because your subject is mostly illuminated, and you have few purely dark areas to mess with the metering. Even then, lower ISO is always better fro image quality.

As for your manual lens, $50 is a good deal, it looks like it goes to f2, which is fast enough.
Thanks for the picture. It looks great!

So, the only extra steps I need to do with a manual lens is just:

1. set it up in settings
2. manually set my aperture on the ring
3. shoot?
12-11-2014, 04:18 AM   #22
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,817
Since it's a Pentax-A, you can use control the aperture from the camera with the lens aperture ring on the "A" setting.

I didn't do anything to my settings, I just put the manual lens on.

You will not be able to use autofocus.

Unless you have a light meter, you'll have to guess the time. This is 20 seconds:


12-11-2014, 07:56 AM   #23
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,445
The front looks spotted and dirty. Check without the filter and be sure the glass is clear and free of scratches.

I also agree with the post showing the kit lens. It is easy to imagine that equipment is the answer. The truth is your 'eye' for composition and your practice with techniques is going to have more impact.
12-11-2014, 01:51 PM   #24
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
Otis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis Fan
Loyal Site Supporter
clackers's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Albums
Posts: 16,397
I agree with Brad.


My shot was actually with a very good Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 on a humble K-30, but the point of operating at low ISO and stopping down is that all lenses can be at their best. You can clean up noise, but the dynamic range is also reduced at high ISO.

Hexism, there's no reason that even with a kit lens good colour range can't be retained by dragging out the exposure time - this is about three seconds, and has been PP'ed:


12-11-2014, 08:52 PM   #25
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
UncleVanya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 28,445
QuoteOriginally posted by clackers Quote
I agree with Brad.


My shot was actually with a very good Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 on a humble K-30, but the point of operating at low ISO and stopping down is that all lenses can be at their best. You can clean up noise, but the dynamic range is also reduced at high ISO.

Hexism, there's no reason that even with a kit lens good colour range can't be retained by dragging out the exposure time - this is about three seconds, and has been PP'ed:

Thank you. I've just swapped my user name around so there is No confusion - previously I was called bradshea here.
12-12-2014, 04:52 AM   #26
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,817
While there are lenses that are better than others, the best prime lens in the world won't improve poor technique. I used to buy new lenses thinking "this will put me on the level I've been seeking" only to be disappointed. I've had my K-5, my first DSLR after decades of using a K-1000 film camera, for about 2 years, and though I mostly shoot using manual settings, I'm still learning about it.

Be patient, and pay attention to your settings while shooting and during review. You will get there.
12-12-2014, 10:23 AM   #27
Veteran Member
ZoeB's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tromsų, Norway
Posts: 886
QuoteOriginally posted by robgski Quote
While there are lenses that are better than others, the best prime lens in the world won't improve poor technique. I used to buy new lenses thinking "this will put me on the level I've been seeking" only to be disappointed. I've had my K-5, my first DSLR after decades of using a K-1000 film camera, for about 2 years, and though I mostly shoot using manual settings, I'm still learning about it.

Be patient, and pay attention to your settings while shooting and during review. You will get there.
I agree wholeheartedly, but there is to a lesser extent such a thing as the wrong tool for the job. In this case, where the OP wants to be able to shoot high quality low light/nighttime candids with his friends in Vegas, and not have to haul around and stop to set up a tripod-- a kit lens isn't really gonna facilitate that, but a cheap fast fifty might. Obviously, it's not gonna do wonders, but it certainly can help.
12-13-2014, 03:43 AM   #28
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
Otis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis Fan
Loyal Site Supporter
clackers's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Albums
Posts: 16,397
For candids, I'd urge the OP to use a flash. Again, the ISO can be kept low, shutter speed doesn't matter except for the background, and the aperture can be small enough for good depth of field as well as image quality.

I have a Sigma 24mm f1.8 but am not taking night pictures of people and landscapes at f1.8!
12-13-2014, 03:54 AM   #29
Veteran Member
Sagitta's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,081
Going to chime in here....

Metering: Are you shooting for the scene, or are you shooting for the lights in the scene? I've found I get my best results if I actually underexpose (I know, counter intuitive here) by anywhere from two to four stops when taking a shot. This allows the lights in the background to have detail to them, and you can always boost the dark by a peg or three in post.

My preferred metering mode is also 'spot' for this same reason - you can meter off the lights and let the rest play out as it will.

Example:
I'm shooting an intersection with street lights, stop lights, etc. If I leave the camera at a 0 for auto-exposure, its going to try to expose for the darkness, and blow the hell out of all the lights. Underexpose (or meter off of a light in the scene if possible) and the shots tend to come out much better.

If you don't have lighting, then pull a tripod into play. At this point, use a remote trigger because you're probably talking exposure times measured in full seconds. If you're still insisting on letting the camera do the thinking, *again* - try underexposing, then boosting in post.

Don't be afraid of higher ISOs. Today's cameras are quite decent right up to ISO 1600 and beyond. Noise isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Last edited by Sagitta; 12-13-2014 at 08:20 AM.
12-13-2014, 08:41 AM - 1 Like   #30
Veteran Member
Sagitta's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,081
Oooh... all double posting... Gives me a chance to show examples however. I rarely drop to ISO100 for my night shots, just to show what I'm talking about. Note: I nuked noise in post for some of these shots. If you're shooting at night, a decent denoising tool is very useful (though not needed)

ISO1600, 30 seconds, 10mm f/3.5, tripodded (of course)


ISO 1600, 1/25 sec, 28mm, probably f/2.8, handheld. I used the street lights to get a base exposure from then upped it a peg


ISO 3200, 1/40 second, 28mm, probably f/2.8, handheld. Again, exposed off the street lights as they were the brightest objects, then adjusted from there.


ISO 6400, 1/200 second, 300mm, probably f/5.6, handheld (never underestimate the power of the in camera shake reduction!)


ISO 1600, 1/125 second, 50mm, probably f/1.4 or f/2, handheld


ISO 1600, 90 seconds, 10mm, probably f/3.5, camera braced against a rock w/OGPS-1 astrotracker at play


To sum up: Don't think you need to be at ISO 100. Crank that ISO northwards and have fun. The best thing you can do is just practice, practice, practice and see what kind of night shooting you get drawn to.

Last edited by Sagitta; 12-13-2014 at 01:05 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
18mm, 20mm, aperture, camera, critique, details, f/3.5, f/8, iso, length, lens, light, lol, mode, night, noise, photography, post, quality, rule, shutter, time

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nature Trying to learn the settings hangman43 Photo Critique 7 11-16-2010 09:37 AM
Please help to recommend a good light tent for jewelry photography raider Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 9 04-09-2010 12:20 AM
Trying to learn how to use strictlypentax Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 19 11-05-2007 06:00 AM
Trying to learn to see cutterpup Post Your Photos! 7 07-13-2007 06:46 AM
Please help me learn manual mode! Chilichoco Pentax DSLR Discussion 12 05-23-2007 12:41 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top