Originally posted by Dartmoor Dave I like the colour version very much, and much more than I liked the B&W. Could it be that the century-old tradition of B&W street photography has descended into cliché, and that colour photography is now the best way to practice street shooting with real honesty?
(On a technical note, if you're not happy with the colour rendering of the M28mm/2.8, the SMC Takumar 28mm/3.5 can give gorgeous results as a manual focus alternative.)
I think what you say is often true, that sometimes the monochrome can come across as cliche -- but I think it all depends on the frame itself. When I am processing an image I think to myself, how can I show the viewer what I am trying to show? For whatever reason, I am more comfortable processing in B/W (I use mainly LR and the NIK suite), but I would be open to suggestions on how to improve color processing.
As to the Takumar 28/3.5, I have been looking around for a lens to which to compare this M28. Any other suggestions? I have also considered the DA 21.
---------- Post added 03-05-15 at 08:08 AM ----------
Originally posted by Dartmoor Dave I like the colour version very much, and much more than I liked the B&W. Could it be that the century-old tradition of B&W street photography has descended into cliché, and that colour photography is now the best way to practice street shooting with real honesty?
(On a technical note, if you're not happy with the colour rendering of the M28mm/2.8, the SMC Takumar 28mm/3.5 can give gorgeous results as a manual focus alternative.)
An additional consideration, for me at lest, is when the ISO gets to be 1600 and above, graininess is more forgivable, it seems, in a BW image.