Originally posted by fg-one Excellent image but can someone explain to me why it was labelled as "not work-safe"? As for the exclusive gallery, forget it Velja. I find some of the early images accepted in that gallery quite ordinary, and certainly not as good as yours, but now, it looks like the gallery has entered an ice age, with only 5 new (outstanding) images in 2015. I think the standard has tremendously raised, which is not a bad thing but is a bit frustrating when you can guess that if the old images were reexamined now using the new notation standards, most of them would fail to qualify.
fg-one,thank you for attention and expressed opinion! Me too, are clear criteria in PEG, more by years !? Personally, I stick to the old adage: "The quality of the shoes, it can give an opinion only shoemaker"!
I want a nice day!