I'm toying with a few different ways to present chrysalises, and looking for any thoughts or comments, etc.
On the left is a Vanessa virginiensis (american lady butterfly), and is roughly 21mm long. Taken at f/16, iso 200, 1/125s, one photo. It has a smidge of grounding (the silk threads at the top), it's uniformly lit to focus on it's bright colours (small softbox on the right, and white card for fill on the left), is hanging in it's 'natural orientation', and a background colour that I hope enhances the little goldy, yellow bits in the chrysalis itself (but I'm thinking could have been a bit brighter).
On the right is a Papilio cresphontes (giant swallowtail butterfly), and is roughly 35mm long. Taken at f/16, iso 80, 1/125s, 10 stacked photos. It has no grounding (silly thing did not attach itself properly to a branch, so I photographed it from above on glass), has higher contrast lighting to show off more texture (small softbox from the left), is either sideways or upside down from it's natural orientation (the head is at the top of the photo), and has a background colour that evokes one of it's common names (orange dog).
So, how do they compare? Do they 'fit' side by side on the same wall despite some of their moral differences? Are they interesting enough to stand alone?
Stacking multiple photos will be the way to go. Though more work, there really is added sharpness at f/8 compared to f/16- I'm also thinking I'd like to print these quite large someday where this will make a bigger difference compared to a small sized version on the web
. Being able to hit front to back sharpness is pretty great. However it kinda shocking just how much squirming these things do when you look close enough between frames.
Thanks for any input!