Originally posted by mahanpots Thanks for the suggestions. I am thinking of a tighter shot that doesn't show the whole installation. I'll try a wider angle as well. I didn't use any additional lighting, and I'm not sure if I should. I kind of feel like I should shoot it according to what the artist is trying to show. And the artist is actually not done entirely, so things may change.
I totally agree with you on this. Assuming the artistic work comprises the suspended glass, white wall, light source and shadows, then what ever you do should capture that without affecting it. Yet sometimes the differences between human eyes and camera lenses calls for a bit for photographic technique to make what the eye sees (or does not see) visible (or invisible) to the camera.
For example, should the stainless steel wires be distinctly visible or invisible in the photo? I could see the artist feeling strongly in either direction and your challenge as a photographer is in replicating that vision in a photographic medium. If the artist wants the viewer to see the wires, then a side light (directed at the wires but not lighting any part of the visible parts of the room) might be very useful for highlighting their presence. If the artist explicitly does not want viewers to notice the wires, then a camera position that avoids reflections off the wires and a shallow DoF that blurs the shadows of the wires might be better.
Of course, as an artist yourself, you might have a different vision and take photographs that emphasize how you, personally, see the work.
Good luck!