Originally posted by aitrus3 I like the added clarity, and the darker/less vibrant purple, but don't like that crop. maybe more off the bottom if you want to crop it like that. while on the left third yes, the snakes eye is in the middle of top/bottom... I preferred the original crop over this one. Without downloading it and looking, the eye was closer to the bottom third, and probably fit a golden ratio crop fairly closely. Not the swirly version, in LR it is the one that almost looks like the 1/3s but the lines are a bit closer in the centre.
---------- Post added 12-16-2019 at 04:46 AM ----------
The original crop also worked for me because it really framed the snake, put it in it's environment, and the little branch at the bottom was a sweet little piece of eye candy...
Well phooey! just kidding; gotta find a nice middle ground I guess. I will re-edit tonight (hopefully) and get back with version '
charlie'.
---------- Post added 12-16-19 at 07:06 PM ----------
Originally posted by Apet-Sure Ask 50 people, get 50 different opinions, right? I'm not crazy about the close crop either. I hope you don't mind, but I downloaded the image and played around with it. I came up with a crop that was 816 Pix tall (817 was too much
). Got rid of almost all of the soft V in the branch at the top and kept most of the branch at the bottom. This put the snake's eye at a location to meet the 2/5ths 'rule' (OK I made that up). Who says we always have to use 1/3; more is better, right? I turned down the saturation of the magenta channel by 15%, and finished with a little overall sharpening. My 2 cents. Others may look at it and think NO! NO! NO!
True true; if I can manage to blend in even 10 of those opinions, and its an improvement, ill take it!
So you mention alot of editing, but no post of a photo? do you have that somewhere?
Nice play on words with your handle by the way