Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!

drmartin · 02-11-2009, 10:46 AM

How you estimate such transfer in BW a colour film?

drmartin · 02-13-2009, 05:29 AM

I have a mistake ?

**Rense** · 02-13-2009, 07:16 AM

Originally posted by drmartin

I have a mistake ?

No drmartin, you did nothing wrong! Comments in this sub-section come just slowly, I think....

I like the conversion and the outcome! The best thing in my opinion is the grain (in the air!). Probably some more detail in the peoples-part (sea and beach) would be nice, but I like it the way it is.

drmartin · 02-13-2009, 10:34 AM

If I have correctly understood, some people occupy an ugly pose? How you consider, it has turned out on "the heat" image?
Thanks, for attention to my work.

**Rense** · 02-13-2009, 02:05 PM

No no, no ugly pose!

It is difficult to see the people in the water. Probably it is the grain, the texture?

drmartin · 02-14-2009, 11:10 AM

Yes, it shot with too grain film(ProFoto 100)

**Scottnorwo** · 02-22-2009, 07:04 AM

The grain in the photo gives it the feel that it is from another time(bikini a give away to modern time). I like it.

JMR · 02-22-2009, 07:46 PM

It's a great BW image. I don't see any hot spots and the grain makes it look like it came out of the 1950's.

JMR

drmartin · 02-25-2009, 06:39 AM

2005

gazonk · 02-25-2009, 06:44 AM

Originally posted by Rense

No no, no ugly pose!

It is difficult to see the people in the water. Probably it is the grain, the texture?

There are a lot of JPEG artifacts, and especially in the water (try enlarging it, and you'll see it). I don't know if this is due to a poor scanner or just wrong settings for downsizing?

Otherwise, nice retro look to that image

drmartin · 02-27-2009, 08:18 AM

Originally posted by gazonk

There are a lot of JPEG artifacts, and especially in the water (try enlarging it, and you'll see it). I don't know if this is due to a poor scanner or just wrong settings for downsizing?

Otherwise, nice retro look to that image

Scintiscanner -nikon super coolscan 4000. I printed the picture of 30 х 45 сm, grain of considerable size on him is not present. The compression of file is credible on a forum results in a bad result. I have a supervision that an image in the internet from a film loses to the image from a digital camera, but at printing to the paper -tape exactly better!

02-11-2009, 10:46 AM	#1
drmartin Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Izhevsk, Russia Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 858	Hot day Lens: A 28\2.8 Camera: LX ISO: --- Shutter Speed: --- Aperture: --- How you estimate such transfer in BW a colour film?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hot Day	jezeks	Monthly Photo Contests	0	08-17-2010 07:27 AM
At the end of a loomy, hot day	Rense	Post Your Photos!	10	07-16-2009 01:41 PM
Another hot summers day.....	MoiVous	Post Your Photos!	8	02-02-2009 03:59 AM
hot hazy day	thomasjmpark	Post Your Photos!	8	05-06-2008 05:59 PM
Hot day	dauvit	Post Your Photos!	1	09-10-2007 12:34 AM

02-13-2009, 05:29 AM	#2
drmartin Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Izhevsk, Russia Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 858 Original Poster	I have a mistake ?

02-13-2009, 07:16 AM	#3
Rense Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Zetten - The Netherlands Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 9,050	Originally posted by drmartin I have a mistake ? No drmartin, you did nothing wrong! Comments in this sub-section come just slowly, I think.... I like the conversion and the outcome! The best thing in my opinion is the grain (in the air!). Probably some more detail in the peoples-part (sea and beach) would be nice, but I like it the way it is.

02-13-2009, 10:34 AM	#4
drmartin Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Izhevsk, Russia Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 858 Original Poster	If I have correctly understood, some people occupy an ugly pose? How you consider, it has turned out on "the heat" image? Thanks, for attention to my work.

02-13-2009, 02:05 PM	#5
Rense Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Zetten - The Netherlands Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 9,050	No no, no ugly pose! It is difficult to see the people in the water. Probably it is the grain, the texture?

02-14-2009, 11:10 AM	#6
drmartin Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Izhevsk, Russia Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 858 Original Poster	Yes, it shot with too grain film(ProFoto 100)

02-22-2009, 07:04 AM	#7
Scottnorwo Millionth Poster! Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Stafford, New York Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,086	The grain in the photo gives it the feel that it is from another time(bikini a give away to modern time). I like it.

02-22-2009, 07:46 PM	#8
JMR Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 3,332	It's a great BW image. I don't see any hot spots and the grain makes it look like it came out of the 1950's. JMR

02-25-2009, 06:39 AM	#9
drmartin Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Izhevsk, Russia Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 858 Original Poster	2005

02-25-2009, 06:44 AM	#10
gazonk Pentaxian Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Oslo area, Norway Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,746	Originally posted by Rense No no, no ugly pose! It is difficult to see the people in the water. Probably it is the grain, the texture? There are a lot of JPEG artifacts, and especially in the water (try enlarging it, and you'll see it). I don't know if this is due to a poor scanner or just wrong settings for downsizing? Otherwise, nice retro look to that image

02-27-2009, 08:18 AM	#11
drmartin Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Izhevsk, Russia Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 858 Original Poster	Originally posted by gazonk There are a lot of JPEG artifacts, and especially in the water (try enlarging it, and you'll see it). I don't know if this is due to a poor scanner or just wrong settings for downsizing? Otherwise, nice retro look to that image Scintiscanner -nikon super coolscan 4000. I printed the picture of 30 х 45 сm, grain of considerable size on him is not present. The compression of file is credible on a forum results in a bad result. I have a supervision that an image in the internet from a film loses to the image from a digital camera, but at printing to the paper -tape exactly better!

Hot day

Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!