Originally posted by slowpez These were deliberately taken backlit to obtain a silhouette. I cropped the first one but left the second alone. Not sure either shot is worth it and wondered what I could have done to improve on them.
Thanks in advance for C&C, Susan
Aperture was f/9.0
Exposure:0.001 sec (1/1000) Aperture: f/9.0 Focal Length: 300 mm
I prefer the second image; it gives me more to "see" with the tones in the rock and the (almost) fur texture. I sure would like to see it with just a bit more detail.
I'm of two minds on this image. On one hand (or one half a brain maybe) it is a visceral, powerful, totemic image that is very evocative; the combination of the silhouette, the bleak monotone background, the tension of the perched animal work together with great force. On the other hand, technically it's a ruined opportunity with muddy color and flat detail.
I guess I like it, but I don't know why or even if I should. I think it's a very good photograph, it just isn't very good photography... if that makes any sense,
Brian