Originally posted by Transit Having no photo browser what so ever left me rather gob smacked...I could open it from faststone but the tooing and frowing left me cold
No bulk editing at all it seems and I was gone.
It's a Photoshop competitor, not a Lightroom competitor. They
are working on a DAM but there have been no clues as to how far away it is. I'm looking forward to that because as a PS competitor it's bloody good.
I've been all over the place on software lately. I was originally happy in LR, then switched to Aperture, then Apple killed that so I went back to LR, then I got sick of the subs, so went to Luminar which I loved as a creative tool, but the vendor is particularly slack at delivering on promises and their DAM was barely functional for me, so I then jumped to PhotoLab 3, which I adore the output from but again the DAM is a bit sketchy (better than Luminar in many ways though) and it has performance issues, so then I took a look at ON1 which also has (lesser) performance issues and simply does not bring out the detail like PhotoLab does. At the moment I use LR (with [I]no subscription]/I] to manage my photos and PhotoLab to process them, while still scoping out if ON1 can replace LR in that setup. In my ideal world, Serif would buy DxO's camera/lens "module" tech and build it into an Affinity DAM.
Originally posted by Transit My friend John died.
He planted a forest.
Sorry to hear that. Forests are great places for reflection. A world of good for people, and good for the world, too.
Originally posted by Kiwizinho The forest will hopefully be around for many years, maybe centuries, to come, but I wonder, what happens to his photos?
I think it's a fatal flaw with all this subscription based cloud stuff. If you die, and stop paying the bills, what happens to it?
Of course there's always FacePlant, which will keep your content online in perpetuity for 'free', funded by fake political ads, but I'm not sure I want to inflict that on future generations.
On the "what happens to the photos" angle, I've got a single, master key, which is my password manager's master password. Inside the password manager are passwords to everything else of value (and much not). My photos are on my computer, backed up locally, backed up to the cloud, and, periodically, further archived to the cloud (i.e. in a non-expiring fashion given the bills keep getting paid).
There are ways of dealing with a digital legacy. Unfortunately, not many people appreciate the need for it, and less still understand how to do it effectively. Every few years I will see a story on a tech site about it, but rarely in the mainstream.
On the telly recently there was a story about a photography company which closed down and they simply gave their entire negative collection to a museum who are now digitising and publishing what they can. Hard copy photos are easy to keep but difficult to share. Digital photos are hard to keep but easy to share.
I'm in the process of writing a personal history and including as many photos as I reasonably can in it. I've been scanning slides and negatives to support some of the older bits and in doing so adding their entire contents into my digital photo collection. It's a fun process rediscovering memories and setting other memories straight where time had warped them. I've also been doing a fair bit of sleuthing online and through modern maps (Google, Apple Maps) to pinpoint places (often with only one or two photos to go on) and give some context along with the photos. It seems, at times, a little self indulgent, but I keep remembering how much I love hoovering up whatever I can find out about Dad from photos and stories scattered around. He, also, had started on his own personal history, but sadly he didn't get far before illness put a stop to it. Now he's gone, we can only piece together what he left. I want to make that much easier for my kids. They probably couldn't care less now, but I hope they will much later on.