Originally posted by Class A I'm assuming you mean the Pentax 17-70. <snip> I guess the Sigma 17-70 has a slight edge over the Pentax version.
Actually, I was talking about the Pentax one, which seems to have an edge over the Sigma one at shorter focal lengths (before going a bit soft closer to 70)
Originally posted by Class A To answer your and Pete's question about focus: I used continuous AF, assigned to the OK button.
Aaah, I thought you might have - I tried this once with trains. They're a little bit too fast...
Originally posted by Class A I don't think this was a clever move by Pentax to cripple the K100D like that. I'm pretty sure it's just a software issue. Buying a 360 just as a controller for another 360 or 540? Nah. I'd be more tempted to get a 360/540 if I could control it with the onboard flash.
You know what? I *used* to think this too, until I actually tried using a single flash off camera. It's servicable, but a second flash would be advantageous... and then that second flash could happily be on the hotshoe.
Also, note that no K Series DSLR can use its onboard flash to wirelessly trigger another flash in HSS mode. For this, you need an on shoe flash to do the triggering.
Originally posted by Class A Radio controlled triggers are tempting and a potential fix, but they don't support P-TTL, are a further expense
This is true, but P-TTL has its quirks. By which I am, unfortunately referring to the 'drooping' eyelid problem which all the modern preflash based TTL flash systems seem to have, to varying degrees. This led to me pretty much giving up on P-TTL for everything except fill light when I'm feeling lazy (or outside in bright light with higher shutter speeds). The 'fix' is to then switch your flash to manual, or automatic mode, set the camera to manual, and actually figure out how you want to balance the exposure yourself. This, by the way is pretty much exactly what Strobist advocates.
Buying a P-TTL capable flash gives you a few handy other things:
1) High Speed Sync. Useful for daylight fill... which is also the exact scenario where I find P-TTL quite useful.
2) The flash can retrieve various things from the camera automatically - for example, the flash head can auto-zoom as you do, and the flash can also automatically update exposure settings in automatic mode.
Originally posted by Class A Make sure you also check out the advice at
Strobist: Lighting 101.
Sooner or later, I think you'll want to move the flash off camera and the above page recommends simple flashes with manual control for doing this.
The reason they suggest manual flashes in twofold:
1) Because some lower end flashes lack a manual mode. Canon, I'm looking at you.
2) Since you're off camera with triggers, you don't need any manufacturer specific features... and they're really suggesting you save your money for pocket wizards...
Originally posted by Class A I need to shot and post pics more often.
Me too!
Originally posted by Class A Definitely the way to go, AFAIC. But then do you want to have fun with cheap but misfiring Cactus ones that either cope with <12V or with >12V? Or do you want to dig deep into your pocket for PocketWizards (magically remove money from your pockets
)?
They're nicknamed Poverty Wizards for a reason
What I've been seriously considering, to be honest, is getting some of the Pentax 5P cables / hot shoe adapters. Off camera flash with full P-TTL capabilities when you want them. Downside wires..... upside.... well there aren't any reliability issues, are there?