Originally posted by NZ_Ross Fantastic attempt to discourage to opposition GUB
.
I am sure that like anyone Class A can learn to use a K-3.
Also, looking at his photography he is clearly being modest about his abilities as well.
---------- Post added 08-06-14 at 08:28 AM ----------
That is an interesting comment. I read a similar one on a 645Z tread from a professional using a 645D who is planning to upgrade at some stage to the Z. The comment was he had learned to use the 645 system on a film camera, and then finally transferred to digital. His opinion was coming from 35mm digital straight to Medium Format digital would be a step to way to far for most amateurs - due to the need for shot discipline, technique, lens and focus selection etc.
It is a very valid point - thinking about it, the stuff you will get away with using a standard 10MP point and shoot, you are not going to get away with using a high end DSLR - especially a 24MP plus one.
It has got me thinking about all the people just buying a Canikon FF camera and some L lenses - I suspect it is too much camera already for many people. It will probably be the same with the Pentax FF.
It might be a case of be careful what you wish for
.
As I have said already the K-3 with the 24MP sensor and updated focus etc is a better camera than my current photographic abilities.
This line of thought and discussion actually confirms my proposed Step 1 for medium format - buy a film one and some lenses and learn to use the format i.e. take the affordable way in and learn first before jumping into expensive gear.
Thanks Class A.
Interesting thoughts. I tend to find myself pushing my camera to its limits, not consistently, but certainly on occasions.
Sometimes it's not always the camera itself, and bettter lenses would help. I notice the Pentax 50 1.7 A is a lot sharper than the kit 18-55 DAL, but there are times when I know I've pushed the camera to its limits. eg. Trying to capture soap bubbles bursting in a candle flame. I needed high ISO to get some sort of semblance of reasonable shutter speed, and also some DOF, but the K-x is just too noisy at the level I ended up using.
I guess I could have tried something like shooting a dark frame to see if I could achieve some noise reduction.
I don't know if newer cameras handle high speeed/low light better, but that's an example where I think the camera was at its limits.
Most of the time I shoot pretty ordinary landscapes, and I don't consistently take good enough photos to demand a higher end camera, but there are times I think it is possible to get to the limits of what a camera can do.
The crazy thing is that having a good camera on hand doesn't necessarily correspond with when you most need it, if it's only part of the time.
My theory is equipment needs to pay for itself if I want to justify upgrading sooner than a normal wear and tear cycle.
Unfortunately the market is flooded with people who think if they own a DSLR it makes them a pro, and being self critical, I know there are a lot of better photographers out there than me, (lots of worse ones too), and it's an intensely competitive industry.
I'd love to be able to abandon being behind a desk and get out every day with a camera to do landscape work, but the harsh reality is there are more people wanting to make money from photography than actually doing well. As a kid, I had a similar interest in flying. I still love planes, but realised that lots of people want to fly, but only a few actually do well out of it, so I've been content to attend air shows and watch people who can afford the hobby.
At least I can afford to enjoy photography, and can take nice photos to the limits of the gear I have.