Originally posted by 85Civic Can I ask your thoughts Ross? K3 (plus aastrotracer down the road) vs K3 II?
No problems - that K3 on TM is a very competitive NZ price for a K3 at the moment. I am really enjoying my K3, but I primarily shoot landscapes, nature, cityscapes and travel stuff handheld. So the K3 II features, whilst nice don't push me to upgrade.
If you are wanting to do astrophotography then the K3 II features are good - no mucking around with extra kit, batteries etc. Pixel shift for tripod landscapes / stuff not moving also gives good possibilities for better image quality.
What do I think is going to happen a bit later this year:
1. The new Pentax FF will entice a lot of people to upgrade from K3, K3 II - it is going to have a pretty good auto APS-C crop based on the lens mounted. It has a tilt-screen and I think it will have a couple of other compelling features. Net result - within 6 months there will be a lot of K3 / K3 II on the market which will lead to lower prices
2. If you look at the new Nikon D500 - it is a very good APS-C camera that is a direct competitor with the Canon 7D II and the K3 II - it has some new features that are well ahead of the Canon and Pentax. Expensive, but high end feature rich. So, I think we will also see Pentax release a APS-C flagship update body later this year, with some feature upgrades - just so Pentax can remain competitive. So, again that will lead to people who aren't going to the Pentax FF still upgrading to the new model - more K3 / K3 II for sale = lower prices.
So....lots of opportunities coming up later this year...but that TM one is also a pretty good price for right now.
The answer lies in what your purchase timeframe is, and how long you are prepared to wait
Cheers
Ross