Nah not yet. Did take photos for our city's Business Awards dinner the other night - in a dimly lit gym! Worked out okay though, better than the year before anyway I reckon. The "Chamber of Commerce" person asked if I was available for other stuff too. And got another wedding (unfortunately
) on 29 December. I do say no to weddings, but then get talked around. At least I now have 2 cameras (bought a 2nd hand D7000 to go with the D300s) so I feel a bit more comfortable. It'll be my 3rd digital wedding (did a film one years ago).
Thanks for the website comment, I often wonder what people's perceptions are of it, and would be happy for anyone to have a gander and comment. I realise it's not state of the art, but hopefully functional and not too ugly. I have considered paying someone to to do something better, but that's as far as I've got.
I can't quite understand Pentax's lens thinking. I'm sure others make a mint off their 70-200/f2.8 ones, and it was the lack of that that helped make me leave the brand, along with the no TC thing. Presumably they've decided to concentrate on the primes etc. but I think they'd do well out of that zoom range. f4 just doesn't cut it.