Originally posted by leping Yes, I actually read that before posting this thread and, frankly, I was quite happy with it even at f/32. But, I was just trying to delve a little deeper into the topic.
And, yes, hyperfocal distance shooting is different than shooting at a test chart, too. And, you're kind of focusing at a "calculated" polnt in space. So, I was just looking for practical experience with other people shooting landscapes and seing how it works in the real world.
BTW, is Photoshop CS5's ACR as good as Lightroom's? Is it the same or are there some differences? Also, with my Nikon D300, if I would bring the NEF files into the Nikon Capture NX software, it would do a
fantastic job removing CA, virutally perfect. It seemed to do it non-linearly. And, I wasn't even using a Nikon lens. I was using a Tamron 12-24mm! However, when I'd try removing CA with PSCS5 ACR, you have to do it manually, which fixes some spots, but then screws up others. So, as for the Pentax 645D, can PS ACR automatically remove the CA for Pentax 645D RAW files (DNG's, for instance)?
Thanks,
Mike
Last edited by chicagonature; 01-07-2011 at 12:01 PM.