Originally posted by Yamanobori My first response would be to just take the 645D. It is a very flexible camera. I would never leave it behind in my hotel room, so it would always be at my finger tips.
The only question would be if you need a wide? Personally, I might just take a few frames with the 55mm and stitch panoramas. Either that, I might take a small camera with one wide. Could you pick up an A35mm or FA35mm? I have a three-lens kit with my 645D--A35mm, DFA55mm, and 67 105mm. My other cameras stay home.
The only other camera I might consider taking that I own is an E-P1 with a 20mm f/1.7. It is a 4:3 format, small, great in very low light, and can record movies. But up to this point, it has not made it into my camera bag.
It really comes down to you and your photography. Are you confident enough with your 645D setup to do good work? Personally, I have no problem traveling with one camera and a normal lens, others need more.
Yes I think you have an excellent point, and this is really the point of discussion for me, I guess. Because of the awesome resolution of the sensor, I actually don't mind cropping a bit for a tele effect. But going wider I need a wider lens.
I have been on a look out for a good copy of A35, as I am more of a manual focus person. I am not sure if I can pick one up before Saturday. Maybe a nice Dubliner/PF member can loan me one while I am there!
I am staying in Dublin for the entire duration of my trip, except I plan to venture out to Portmarnock and play some golf for one day. So, I am thinking that I may get away with not having a wider lens, as I am not going to "climb to the top of the mountain" for a sweeping view.
But yes it makes me want to take my APSC set up just for that reason though.
I now feel pretty comfy with this camera. It was a bit weird for me at first, having never shot in MF. But now I love it, and so much so that I just bought a 67 body with a couple lenses. 105/2.8 67 is an awesome lens, I tell you. But I think 165/2.8 67 is just as fantastic too.