Originally posted by eddie1960 Platinum and palladium prints are amazing but a hellish amount of work (and very expensive - great for art gallery work where you can price to meet costs (and in fact if you price an 8x10 at anything less than $250-300 minimum you will fail and your work will be deemed more suitable to a home furnishing store or craft show )
All too true, I typically double the price of my platinum prints so I can continue platinum/palladium printing whilst keeping it profitable, and yes platinum requires some very expensive equipment to print with - especially if you do enlargements, Platinum prints are typically done as contact prints. Fortunately for me I inherited my grandfathers UV enlarger* which is equipped with a Super-achromatic enlarging lens. To give you an idea what my platinum works usually cost I recently sold a 13"X19" pure platinum print to a collector for $1,670US
Originally posted by eddie1960 You would think the high end wedding guys (many of whom still shoot some B/W film) would actively market this idea wouldn't you? The only Platinum work i see is all fine art and priced as such. It's also not like you can send out for platinum to be printed which most of them do with film and digital, and in fact i doubt many have seen the inside of a darkroom in years. and most people who have done darkroom work have never done any of the more complex alternative processes that require you to make your own paper and a whole different workflow I think a smart guy could do platinum, palladium (the budget platinum) bromoil and more for the wedding market
The problem is the rarity and expense of acquiring the equipment and developing the skills and knowledge of chemistry to mass produce the emulsion at a cost effective ratio (in my family we have our own method) but the most important material in platinum printing - ferric oxalate which has to be highly purified is extremely difficult to come by and getting it pre-made by someone else is difficult because there is no guarantee that it will be of high enough quality and making the stuff yourself can be hazardous from exposure to some pretty dangerous chemicals.
I have done platinum prints for a wedding once, but that was for an anniversary gift for family member. The two prints at 11"X14" I used an experimental platinum/rhodium combination which produced a very interesting split tone to the final prints. But the cost of mass producing prints like those would be astronomical, only collectors would be interested. But producing platinum/palladium prints for weddings? I hate to sound pessimistic but let's be honest about the divorce rate: here in OZ one in three couples end up filing for divorce, I don't know what things are like in the US but having a photograph that is going to last for over 1000+ years can be a liability for some people.
*It Uses a Carbon Arc lamp as the primary light source, Carbon arc lamps have an extremely strong emission spike at 400Nm which is perfect for platinum or cyanotype printing - but bad news for me, because concentrated 400nm UV-A light can be more than a little bit dangerous.