Originally posted by RobertH
Great images, Ive only had mine for a weekend. Surprised at the High ISO's you used in many of the photos, and yet, it seems the Z is so much better at that than my Mark2. Thank you for sharing
Hi Robert, thanks for the complements.
Reason I used an ISO for 400 is because often 100-200 would be too slow to catch movement of animals or shake of the transport does affect me holding the telephoto. Given the clean ISO ability of the 645Z, 800 would have very well possible. But I decided 400 was better to prevent over exposure and I could get the high shutter speed I wanted at F8 through to F13 easily (1/250 and above). Given the great DR, highlight control would have been well controlled or easily corrected with LR.
As for 6400, 12800 which I used for the milky way or after sunset I am very impressed. There is good control and sharpness at F4-F8 at low light. I would dare say the Z is better than most camera out there in the latest generation at the moment due to sensor size (which in turn better handles noise). I was surprised at the results versus the new generation of Nikons, etc.